233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23294266)
1. Capillary versus venous haemoglobin determination in the assessment of healthy blood donors.
Patel AJ; Wesley R; Leitman SF; Bryant BJ
Vox Sang; 2013 May; 104(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 23294266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of two-step haemoglobin screening with HemoCue for blood donor qualification in mobile collection sites.
Gómez-Simón A; Plaza EM; Torregrosa JM; Ferrer-Marín F; Sánchez-Guiu I; Vicente V; Lozano ML; Rivera J
Vox Sang; 2014 Nov; 107(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 24916720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of four methods to measure haemoglobin concentrations in whole blood donors (COMPARE): A diagnostic accuracy study.
Bell S; Sweeting M; Ramond A; Chung R; Kaptoge S; Walker M; Bolton T; Sambrook J; Moore C; McMahon A; Fahle S; Cullen D; Mehenny S; Wood AM; Armitage J; Ouwehand WH; Miflin G; Roberts DJ; Danesh J; Di Angelantonio E;
Transfus Med; 2021 Apr; 31(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 33341984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the validity of a rapid method for measuring high and low haemoglobin levels in whole blood donors.
Shahshahani HJ; Meraat N; Mansouri F
Blood Transfus; 2013 Jul; 11(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 23114520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of capillary hemoglobin levels using the HemoCue system in intensive care patients.
Seguin P; Kleiber A; Chanavaz C; Morcet J; Mallédant Y
J Crit Care; 2011 Aug; 26(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 21036530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemoglobin assessment: precision and practicability evaluated in the Netherlands-the HAPPEN study.
Baart AM; de Kort WL; van den Hurk K; Pasker-de Jong PC
Transfusion; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1984-93. PubMed ID: 26968697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of capillary hemoglobin screening under routine conditions.
Ziemann M; Lizardo B; Geusendam G; Schlenke P
Transfusion; 2011 Dec; 51(12):2714-9. PubMed ID: 21599674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between two portable hemoglobinometers and a reference method to verify the reliability of screening in blood donors.
Rudolf-Oliveira RC; Gonçalves KT; Martignago ML; Mengatto V; Gaspar PC; Ferreira Jdos S; de Castro JC; Bazzo ML; Santos-Silva MC
Transfus Apher Sci; 2013 Dec; 49(3):578-82. PubMed ID: 24119714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of HemoCue® hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan.
Adam I; Ahmed S; Mahmoud MH; Yassin MI
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():30. PubMed ID: 22436620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin sensor (NBM-200) and portable hemoglobinometer (HemoCue) with an automated hematology analyzer (LH500) in blood donor screening.
Kim MJ; Park Q; Kim MH; Shin JW; Kim HO
Ann Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 33(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23826562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical evaluation of the Hemocue haemoglobinometer using capillary, venous and arterial samples.
Chen PP; Short TG; Leung DH; Oh TE
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1992 Nov; 20(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 1463181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HemoCue Hb-801 Provides More Accurate Hemoglobin Assessment in Blood Donors Than OrSense NBM-200.
Seekircher L; Siller A; Amato M; Tschiderer L; Balog A; Astl M; Schennach H; Willeit P
Transfus Med Rev; 2024 Apr; 38(2):150826. PubMed ID: 38581862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between the HemoCue and an automated counter for measuring hemoglobin.
Paiva Ade A; Rondó PH; Silva SS; Latorre Mdo R
Rev Saude Publica; 2004 Aug; 38(4):585-7. PubMed ID: 15311302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive methods for haemoglobin screening in prospective blood donors.
Belardinelli A; Benni M; Tazzari PL; Pagliaro P
Vox Sang; 2013 Aug; 105(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 23600766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical analysis of inappropriate results from current Hb screening methods for blood donors.
James V; Jones KF; Turner EM; Sokol RJ
Transfusion; 2003 Mar; 43(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 12675728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Venous sample is superior to repeated skin-prick testing in blood donor haemoglobin second-line screening.
Bäckman S; Valkeajärvi A; Korkalainen P; Arvas M; Castrén J
Vox Sang; 2020 Nov; 115(8):617-623. PubMed ID: 32314403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability in haemoglobin concentration by measurement tool and blood source: an analysis from seven countries.
Rappaport AI; Karakochuk CD; Hess SY; Whitehead RD; Namaste SML; Dary O; Parker ME; Neufeld LM; Larson LM; Newton S; Wegmuller R; Moorthy D
J Clin Pathol; 2021 Oct; 74(10):657-663. PubMed ID: 33023940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The importance of the preoperative measurement of hemoglobin concentration. Evaluation of a colorimetric method (Hemocue)].
Sfez M; Desruelle P; Pennecot GF; Cohen-Bacrie P
Cah Anesthesiol; 1991; 39(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 1933523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the haemoglobin colour scale for screening blood donors in Malawi.
M'baya B; Mbingwani I; Mgawi L; Mkochi V; Bates I; White SA; Allain TJ
Malawi Med J; 2014 Jun; 26(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 25157313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of four rapid methods for hemoglobin screening of whole blood donors in mobile collection settings.
Gómez-Simón A; Navarro-Núñez L; Pérez-Ceballos E; Lozano ML; Candela MJ; Cascales A; Martínez C; Corral J; Vicente V; Rivera J
Transfus Apher Sci; 2007 Jun; 36(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 17556020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
