These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23294740)

  • 1. A method for identifying extreme OSCE examiners.
    Bartman I; Smee S; Roy M
    Clin Teach; 2013 Feb; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23294740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does a Rater's Professional Background Influence Communication Skills Assessment?
    Artemiou E; Hecker KG; Adams CL; Coe JB
    J Vet Med Educ; 2015; 42(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 26315214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of first impressions on subsequent ratings within an OSCE station.
    Wood TJ; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh D; Touchie C
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):969-983. PubMed ID: 27848171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of differential rater function over time (DRIFT) on objective structured clinical examination ratings.
    McLaughlin K; Ainslie M; Coderre S; Wright B; Violato C
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):989-92. PubMed ID: 19769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors.
    Gingerich A; Regehr G; Eva KW
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S1-7. PubMed ID: 21955759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments.
    Wood TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Aug; 19(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 23529821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' communication skills using an objective structured clinical examination: the importance of context.
    Hecker KG; Adams CL; Coe JB
    J Vet Med Educ; 2012; 39(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 22951466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of medical student clinical reasoning by "lay" vs physician raters: inter-rater reliability using a scoring guide in a multidisciplinary objective structured clinical examination.
    Berger AJ; Gillespie CC; Tewksbury LR; Overstreet IM; Tsai MC; Kalet AL; Ogilvie JB
    Am J Surg; 2012 Jan; 203(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22172486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Managing extremes of assessor judgment within the OSCE.
    Fuller R; Homer M; Pell G; Hallam J
    Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 27670246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a rater training on rating accuracy in a physical examination skills assessment.
    Weitz G; Vinzentius C; Twesten C; Lehnert H; Bonnemeier H; König IR
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2014; 31(4):Doc41. PubMed ID: 25489341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two models of raters in a structured oral examination: does it make a difference?
    Touchie C; Humphrey-Murto S; Ainslie M; Myers K; Wood TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Mar; 15(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 19657717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twelve tips for designing and implementing a structured rater training in OSCEs.
    Preusche I; Schmidts M; Wagner-Menghin M
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 22452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations?
    Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Nandagopal K; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 15316270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can physician examiners overcome their first impression when examinee performance changes?
    Wood TJ; Pugh D; Touchie C; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Oct; 23(4):721-732. PubMed ID: 29556923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training.
    Jefferies A; Simmons B; Tabak D; McIlroy JH; Lee KS; Roukema H; Skidmore M
    Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):183-91. PubMed ID: 17701631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' clinical skills using objective structured clinical examinations.
    Hecker K; Read EK; Vallevand A; Krebs G; Donszelmann D; Muelling CK; Freeman SL
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 21135408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the raters: inter-rater reliability of standardized anaesthesia simulator performance.
    Devitt JH; Kurrek MM; Cohen MM; Fish K; Fish P; Murphy PM; Szalai JP
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Sep; 44(9):924-8. PubMed ID: 9305554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater Reliability of Standardized Actors Versus Nonactors in a Simulation Based Assessment of Interprofessional Collaboration.
    Dickter DN; Stielstra S; Lineberry M
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Aug; 10(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 26098494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.