These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23294740)

  • 21. Do preceptors with more rating experience provide more reliable assessments of medical student performance?
    Ferguson KJ; Kreiter CD; Axelson RD
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 22490088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating rater competency for CNS clinical trials.
    Targum SD
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Jun; 26(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 16702896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In the minds of OSCE examiners: uncovering hidden assumptions.
    Chahine S; Holmes B; Kowalewski Z
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 26661783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
    Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo response.
    Kobak KA; Leuchter A; DeBrota D; Engelhardt N; Williams JB; Cook IA; Leon AC; Alpert J
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Apr; 30(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 20520295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale.
    Wu SM; Whiteside U; Neighbors C
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2007; 36(4):230-9. PubMed ID: 18049948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners?
    McLaughlin K; Gregor L; Jones A; Coderre S
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16504145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accurate surgical skills evaluation: Does it mandate raters have a medical background?
    Zeb M; Jyot A; Abbott E; Gomez M; Baloul M; Farley D
    Am J Surg; 2018 Mar; 215(3):395-398. PubMed ID: 29153249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.
    Govaerts MJ; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):239-60. PubMed ID: 17096207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Global rating scale for the assessment of paramedic clinical competence.
    Tavares W; Boet S; Theriault R; Mallette T; Eva KW
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 22834959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Who should rate candidates in an objective structured clinical examination?
    Martin JA; Reznick RK; Rothman A; Tamblyn RM; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 1996 Feb; 71(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 8615935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.
    McManus IC; Thompson M; Mollon J
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16919156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. OSCE rater cognition - an international multi-centre qualitative study.
    Hyde S; Fessey C; Boursicot K; MacKenzie R; McGrath D
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jan; 22(1):6. PubMed ID: 34980099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Applying generalizability theory to high-stakes objective structured clinical examinations in a naturalistic environment.
    Lawson DM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006; 29(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 16904492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The reliability of six faculty members in identifying important OSCE items.
    Valentino J; Donnelly MB; Sloan DA; Schwartz RW; Haydon RC
    Acad Med; 1998 Feb; 73(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 9484196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increasing inter-rater agreement on a family medicine clerkship oral examination--a pilot study.
    Schwiebert P; Davis A
    Fam Med; 1993 Mar; 25(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 8458559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. OSCE circuit performance effects: Does circuit order influence scores?
    Monteiro SD; Walsh A; Grierson LE
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 26421751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.