These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23294740)

  • 41. Video Recording in Veterinary Medicine OSCEs: Feasibility and Inter-rater Agreement between Live Performance Examiners and Video Recording Reviewing Examiners.
    Tan JY; Ma IWY; Hunt JA; Kwong GPS; Farrell R; Bell C; Read EK
    J Vet Med Educ; 2021 Aug; 48(4):485-491. PubMed ID: 32758091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rater Errors in Clinical Performance Assessments.
    Royal KD; Hecker KG
    J Vet Med Educ; 2016; 43(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 26560550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Rater characteristics, response content, and scoring contexts: Decomposing the determinates of scoring accuracy.
    Palermo C
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():937097. PubMed ID: 36033049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process.
    Mazor KM; Zanetti ML; Alper EJ; Hatem D; Barrett SV; Meterko V; Gammon W; Pugnaire MP
    Med Educ; 2007 Apr; 41(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 17430277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Awarding global grades in OSCEs: evaluation of a novel eLearning resource for OSCE examiners.
    Gormley GJ; Johnston J; Thomson C; McGlade K
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(7):587-9. PubMed ID: 22632277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Examiners are most lenient at the start of a two-day OSCE.
    Hope D; Cameron H
    Med Teach; 2015 Jan; 37(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 25154400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using standardized video cases for assessment of medical communication skills: reliability of an objective structured video examination by computer.
    Hulsman RL; Mollema ED; Oort FJ; Hoos AM; de Haes JC
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jan; 60(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16332467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study.
    Conigliaro RL; Stratton TD
    Med Educ; 2010 Apr; 44(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 20444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination?
    Chenot JF; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Koch A; Fischer T; Scherer M; Emmert B; Stanske B; Kochen MM; Himmel W
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 17973763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Portfolios for assessment of paediatric specialist registrars.
    Melville C; Rees M; Brookfield D; Anderson J
    Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1117-25. PubMed ID: 15461658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Exploring the impact of mental workload on rater-based assessments.
    Tavares W; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 May; 18(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 22484964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. When raters disagree, then what: examining a third-rating discrepancy resolution procedure and its utility for identifying unusual patterns of ratings.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(3):300-24. PubMed ID: 12147915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development and pilot testing of an OSCE for difficult conversations in surgical intensive care.
    Chipman JG; Beilman GJ; Schmitz CC; Seatter SC
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 17462207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Applying Kane's validity framework to a simulation based assessment of clinical competence.
    Tavares W; Brydges R; Myre P; Prpic J; Turner L; Yelle R; Huiskamp M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 May; 23(2):323-338. PubMed ID: 29079933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The use of scoring rubrics to determine clinical performance in the operating suite.
    Nicholson P; Gillis S; Dunning AM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2009 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 18755529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method.
    Homer M; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.
    Tavares W; Ginsburg S; Eva KW
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 26787084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. DRIFT happens, sometimes: Examining time based rater variance in a high-stakes OSCE.
    Coetzee K; Monteiro S
    Med Teach; 2019 Jul; 41(7):819-823. PubMed ID: 30955444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?
    Faherty A; Counihan T; Kropmans T; Finn Y
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32393228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB").
    Kim J; Neilipovitz D; Cardinal P; Chiu M
    Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 19212245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.