These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2329484)

  • 1. Comparison of A-scan device accuracy.
    Giers U; Epple C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1990 Mar; 16(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 2329484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.
    Trivedi RH; Wilson ME
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Mar; 118(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 21035871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation.
    Schelenz J; Kammann J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1989 Jul; 15(4):425-8. PubMed ID: 2674412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Axial length measurement and its relation to intraocular lens power calculations.
    Shammas HJ
    J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1982; 8(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 7166517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses.
    Holladay JT; Gills JP; Leidlein J; Cherchio M
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jul; 103(7):1118-23. PubMed ID: 8684803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immersion B-guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes.
    Abu El Einen KG; Shalaby MH; El Shiwy HT
    Retina; 2011 Feb; 31(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 20829737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of biometric measurements using partial coherence interferometry and applanation ultrasound.
    Tehrani M; Krummenauer F; Kumar R; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Apr; 29(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 12686243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The reliability of ultrasound biometry].
    Giers U; Epple C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Mar; 196(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 2188041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer.
    Ventura BV; Ventura MC; Wang L; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.
    Moon SW; Lim SH; Lee HY
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):444-50. PubMed ID: 25435746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster .
    Lam AK; Chan R; Pang PC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Nov; 21(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 11727876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers.
    Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biometry of the posterior lens capsule: a new method to predict pseudophakic anterior chamber depth.
    Naeser K; Boberg-Ans J; Bargum R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1990 Mar; 16(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 2329478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.
    Su PF; Lo AY; Hu CY; Chang SW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1193-200. PubMed ID: 19050474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery.
    Drexler W; Findl O; Menapace R; Rainer G; Vass C; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Oct; 126(4):524-34. PubMed ID: 9780097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biometry data from caucasian and african-american cataractous pediatric eyes.
    Trivedi RH; Wilson ME
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4671-8. PubMed ID: 17898291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.