320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23295274)
1. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.
Coe SG; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):219-26; quiz 227. PubMed ID: 23295274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.
Ussui V; Coe S; Rizk C; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 110(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 25267326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of an endoscopic quality improvement program on adenoma detection rates: a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial in a clinical practice setting (EQUIP-3).
Wallace MB; Crook JE; Thomas CS; Staggs E; Parker L; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):538-545.e4. PubMed ID: 27473182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal surveillance interval assignment based on in vivo prediction of polyp histology: impact of endoscopic quality improvement program.
Coe SG; Thomas C; Crook J; Ussui V; Diehl N; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jul; 76(1):118-25.e1. PubMed ID: 22726470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.
Do A; Weinberg J; Kakkar A; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23211748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Training interventions to improve adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lim S; Hammond S; Park J; Hochman D; Lê ML; Rabbani R; Abou-Setta A; Zarychanski R
Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3870-3882. PubMed ID: 31595401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training.
van Doorn SC; Klanderman RB; Hazewinkel Y; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jul; 82(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 25817896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging and pit pattern analysis significantly improved for less-experienced endoscopists after an expanded training program.
Higashi R; Uraoka T; Kato J; Kuwaki K; Ishikawa S; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Ikematsu H; Sano Y; Suzuki S; Murakami Y; Yamamoto K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 20493482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EQUIPping ourselves for future quality improvements in colonoscopy.
Robertson DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 23381073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
