536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23295495)
21. Development of a software platform for providing environmental monitoring data for the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident.
Seki A; Saito O; Nago H; Suzuki K; Tomishima K; Saito K; Takemiya H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25536964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The use of computer system in the introduction of countermeasures in agriculture after the Chernobyl accident].
Panov AV; Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2005; 45(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 15810519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lessons Learned from the Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant-More than Basic Knowledge: Education and its Effects Improve the Preparedness and Response to Radiation Emergency.
Hachiya M; Akashi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27466457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measures against increased environmental radiation dose by the TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident in some local governments in the Tokyo metropolitan area: focusing on examples of both Kashiwa and Nagareyama cities in Chiba prefecture.
Iimoto T; Fujii H; Oda S; Nakamura T; Hayashi R; Kuroda R; Furusawa M; Umekage T; Ohkubo Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Nov; 152(1-3):210-4. PubMed ID: 22927655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. New regulations for radiation protection for work involving radioactive fallout emitted by the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi APP accident: application expansion to recovery and reconstruction work.
Yasui S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(8):D105-14. PubMed ID: 24593039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Averting cumulative lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer by decontamination of residential areas affected by a large-scale nuclear power plant fallout: time aspects of radiological benefits for newborns and adults.
Rääf C; Finck R; Martinsson J; Hinrichsen Y; Isaksson M
J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):790-814. PubMed ID: 32492663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Consequences and countermeasures in a nuclear power accident: Chernobyl experience.
Kirichenko VA; Kirichenko AV; Werts DE
Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Sep; 10(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 22853775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radionuclides from the Fukushima accident in the air over Lithuania: measurement and modelling approaches.
Lujanienė G; Byčenkienė S; Povinec PP; Gera M
J Environ Radioact; 2012 Dec; 114():71-80. PubMed ID: 22206700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Radiological assessment of protective countermeasures in the private sector of rural settlements in the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident area].
Panov AV; Fesenko SV; Aleksakhin RM; Pasternak AD; Prudnikov PV
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2007; 47(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 17571731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fukushima health risks scrutinized.
Butler D
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7341):13-4. PubMed ID: 21475164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Radioxenon monitoring in Beijing following the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident.
Shilian W; Qi L; Qinghua M; Zhanying C; Yungang Z; Huijuan L; Huaimao J; Yinzhong C; Shujiang L; Xinjun Z; Yuanqing F; Ling W; Yun L
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():344-7. PubMed ID: 23601858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Fukushima accident--health consequences.
Tangen JM; Jaworska A; Mattsson H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Nov; 131(23):2342-3. PubMed ID: 22139113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiological accident and incident in Thailand: lesson to be learned.
Ya-anant N; Tiyapun K; Saiyut K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):111-4. PubMed ID: 21561942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Comparison of Remediation After The Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi Accidents.
Howard BJ; Fesenko S; Balonov M; Pröhl G; Nakayama S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(1-3):170-176. PubMed ID: 27886996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modeling the early-phase redistribution of radiocesium fallouts in an evergreen coniferous forest after Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents.
Calmon P; Gonze MA; Mourlon Ch
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Oct; 529():30-9. PubMed ID: 26005747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Valentin J;
Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Removing radioactive waste from enterprises and territories of Moscow and central region of Russia is a main goal of RADON Industrial Research Association].
Salikov VA; Safronov VG; Matiukha AD; Kistanov EM
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2006; (2):17-21. PubMed ID: 16568840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Justification of remediation strategies in the long term after the Chernobyl accident.
Fesenko S; Jacob P; Ulanovsky A; Chupov A; Bogdevich I; Sanzharova N; Kashparov V; Panov A; Zhuchenka Y
J Environ Radioact; 2013 May; 119():39-47. PubMed ID: 20884101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radioactive contamination monitoring for the Korean public following Fukushima nuclear accident.
Ha WH; Yoo J; Yoon S; Pak MJ; Park S; Kim MR; Lee SS
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():371-3. PubMed ID: 23541790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of the 50-year records of the atmospheric deposition of long-lived radionuclides in Japan.
Hirose K; Igarashi Y; Aoyama M
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1675-8. PubMed ID: 18502651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
