These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23296030)

  • 1. The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: an in vitro study, part I.
    Arat Bilhan S; Bilhan H; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Baykasoglu C; Kutay O
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 23296030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis.
    Arat Bilhan S; Baykasoglu C; Bilhan H; Kutay O; Mugan A
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25443880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
    Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments.
    Manju V; Sreelal T
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 22891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective 2-year clinical evaluation of overdentures attached to nonsplinted implants utilizing ERA attachments.
    Landa LS; Cho SC; Froum SJ; Elian N; Tarnow DP
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):151-6; quiz 158. PubMed ID: 11315434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of implant number and attachment type on maximum bite force of mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study.
    Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Cilingir A; Bozdag E
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e116-20. PubMed ID: 20735488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
    Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional force measurements with mandibular overdentures connected to implants by ball-shaped retentive anchors. A clinical study.
    Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 9509778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
    van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintenance requirements associated with mandibular implant overdentures: clinical results after first year of service.
    Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bilmenoglu C
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 20932124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.