140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297330)
1. Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest.
Viner M; Mercier G; Hao F; Malladi A; Subramaniam RM
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 23297330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-time-point FDG PET/CT: liver SULmean repeatability.
Tahari AK; Paidpally V; Chirindel A; Wahl RL; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 25615764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Liver standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass at FDG PET/CT: effect of FDG uptake time.
Chirindel A; Alluri KC; Tahari AK; Chaudhry M; Wahl RL; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 40(1):e17-22. PubMed ID: 24873794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FDG PET/CT interobserver agreement in head and neck cancer: FDG and CT measurements of the primary tumor site.
Jackson T; Chung MK; Mercier G; Ozonoff A; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Mar; 33(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 22227560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interreader agreement and variability of FDG PET volumetric parameters in human solid tumors.
Paidpally V; Mercier G; Shah BA; Senthamizhchelvan S; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 24450684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hepatic 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements on PET/MR: Impact of Volume of Interest Location on Repeatability.
Domachevsky L; Bernstine H; Nidam M; Stein D; Goldberg N; Stern D; Abadi-Korek I; Groshar D
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2017; 2017():8639731. PubMed ID: 29097940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of hepatic steatosis on liver FDG uptake measured in mean standard uptake values.
Abele JT; Fung CI
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):917-24. PubMed ID: 20177102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of metabolically active tumor volume measurements with FDG PET/CT in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies: a multicenter study.
Frings V; van Velden FH; Velasquez LM; Hayes W; van de Ven PM; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R
Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 24865311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver variability among measurements of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and measurements of tumor size on diagnostic CT in patients with pulmonary tumors.
Huang YE; Chen CF; Huang YJ; Konda SD; Appelbaum DE; Pu Y
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):782-8. PubMed ID: 20707663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The analysis of factors affecting the threshold on repeated 18F-FDG-PET/CT investigations measured by the PERCIST protocol in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Fencl P; Belohlavek O; Harustiak T; Zemanova M
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1188-94. PubMed ID: 22828453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-depth analysis of interreader agreement and accuracy in categorical assessment of brown adipose tissue in (18)FDG-PET/CT.
Becker AS; Zellweger C; Schawkat K; Bogdanovic S; Phi van VD; Nagel HW; Wolfrum C; Burger IA
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():41-46. PubMed ID: 28629569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging features of colorectal liver metastasis in FDG PET-CT: a retrospective correlative analysis between CT attenuation and FDG uptake.
Au-Yeung AW; Luk WH; Lo AX
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Apr; 33(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 22273638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FDG-PET/CT characterization of adrenal nodules: diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement using quantitative and qualitative methods.
Evans PD; Miller CM; Marin D; Stinnett SS; Wong TZ; Paulson EK; Ho LM
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 23830599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability of Hepatic 18F-FDG Uptake at Interim PET in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Rubello D; Gordien P; Morliere C; Guyot M; Bordenave L; Colletti PM; Hindié E
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 40(8):e405-10. PubMed ID: 26018686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of adipose tissue volume can significantly affect the metabolic activity of reference organs in
Yoo ID; Lee SM; Lee JW; Oh JE; Cho YJ; Shin HS
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 29177259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alveolar echinococcosis: correlation between hepatic MRI findings and FDG-PET/CT metabolic activity.
Azizi A; Blagosklonov O; Lounis A; Berthet L; Vuitton DA; Bresson-Hadni S; Delabrousse E
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 24970734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone marrow 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography cannot replace bone marrow biopsy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; Fijnheer R; Dubois SV; Nievelstein RA; de Klerk JM
Am J Hematol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):726-31. PubMed ID: 24711255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
Donati OF; Hany TF; Reiner CS; von Schulthess GK; Marincek B; Seifert B; Weishaupt D
J Nucl Med; 2010 May; 51(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 20395324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
