These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297812)

  • 21. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.
    Jampel HD; Friedman DS; Quigley H; Miller R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1059-67. PubMed ID: 11923247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability and validity of an automated computerized visual acuity and stereoacuity test in children using an interactive video game.
    Ma DJ; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):195-201.e1. PubMed ID: 23582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glaucoma patients' assessment of their visual function and quality of life.
    Jampel HD
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():301-17. PubMed ID: 11797316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stereoacuity in unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool screening: outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.
    Richardson SR; Wright CM; Hrisos S; Buck D; Clarke MP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 46(1):150-4. PubMed ID: 15623768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stereoacuity and depth perception decrease with increased instrument magnification: comparing a non-magnified system with lens loupes and a surgical microscope.
    Du LT; Wessels IF; Underdahl JP; Auran JD
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11240937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma.
    Talbot R; Goldberg I; Kelly P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Loss of stereopsis with optic chiasmal lesions and stereoscopic tests as a differential test.
    Hirai T; Ito Y; Arai M; Ota Y; Kojima T; Sato M; Miyake Y
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Sep; 109(9):1692-702. PubMed ID: 12208719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reduced binocular beat visual evoked responses and stereoacuity in patients with Duane syndrome.
    Sloper JJ; Garnham C; Gous P; Dyason R; Plunkett D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 42(12):2826-30. PubMed ID: 11687524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decrease in stereoacuity in the seventh decade of life.
    Brown B; Yap MK; Fan WC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Apr; 13(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 8265147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Wilensky JT; Hawkins A
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of videoconferencing on the depth perception of observers.
    Wootton R; Collins M; Loughridge J; Loane M
    J Telemed Telecare; 2001; 7(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 11331048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distance stereoacuity norms for the mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester in young children and young adults.
    Yildirim C; Altinsoy HI; Yakut E
    J AAPOS; 1998 Feb; 2(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10532363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pitfalls in the Use of Stereoacuity in the Diagnosis of Nonorganic Visual Loss.
    Sitko KR; Peragallo JH; Bidot S; Biousse V; Newman NJ; Bruce BB
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Jan; 123(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 26481817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction in binocular enhancement of the visual-evoked potential during development accompanies increasing stereoacuity.
    Sloper JJ; Collins AD
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1998; 35(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 9627876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Kumar AU; Babu JG; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24-2 visual fields.
    Tattersall CL; Vernon SA; Menon GJ
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Mar; 21(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 16424913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short duration transient visual evoked potentials in glaucomatous eyes.
    Prata TS; Lima VC; De Moraes CG; Trubnik V; Derr P; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Tello C
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Aug; 21(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 21562431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stereopsis in bilaterally pseudophakic patients.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1466-70. PubMed ID: 15210224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient awareness of binocular central scotoma in age-related macular degeneration.
    Fletcher DC; Schuchard RA; Renninger LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1395-8. PubMed ID: 22863789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.