285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297849)
1. In vivo evaluation of occlusalcontact area and maximum bite force in patients with various types of implant-supported prostheses.
Baca E; Yengin E; Gökçen-Röhlig B; Sato S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Sep; 71(5):1181-7. PubMed ID: 23297849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Falk H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal force and mandibular movements in patients with removable overdentures and fixed prostheses supported by implants in the maxilla.
Jemt T; Book K; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 8225465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusal contacts of edentulous patients with mandibular hybrid dentures opposing maxillary complete dentures.
Suzuki T; Kumagai H; Yoshitomi N; McGlumphy EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 10453664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal force pattern in dentitions with mandibular implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses occluded with complete dentures.
Falk H; Laurell L; Lundgren D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 2689336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of dental implants in combination with removable partial dentures: a case report.
Chronopoulos V; Sarafianou A; Kourtis S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 19120779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year longitudinal study of masticatory function in edentulous patients treated with fixed complete dentures on osseointegrated implants.
Carlsson GE; Lindquist LW
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):448-53. PubMed ID: 7802913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occlusal interferences and cantilever joint stress in implant-supported prostheses occluding with complete dentures.
Falk H; Laurell L; Lundgren D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 2391138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.
Davis DM; Packer ME; Watson RM
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 14651238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Within-patient evaluation of chewing efficiency and maximum bite force of conventional dentures, fixed prostheses, and milled bar overdentures used for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation of atrophied mandibular ridges: A short-term randomized trial.
ELsyad MA; Tella EAES; Mohamed SS; Mahrous AI
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):522-531. PubMed ID: 35679127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Gnathology in implant-supported fixed restoration in edentulous mandible].
Yu WQ; Li XQ; Ma L; Ma XN; Xu X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 38(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 32037763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
