These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297849)

  • 21. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
    Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical interpretation of a masticatory normative indicator analysis of masticatory function in subjects with different occlusal and prosthodontic status.
    Witter DJ; Woda A; Bronkhorst EM; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 23438416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures.
    Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
    Implant Dent; 2002; 11(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 12271568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Occlusal analysis of implant-supported fixed denture in edentulous patients].
    Li XQ; Ma XN; Xu X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 36(6):628-632. PubMed ID: 30593108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism.
    Göre E; Evlioğlu G
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22242658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Avoiding osseous grafting in the atrophic posterior mandible for implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a report of 2 cases.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masticatory performance, maximum occlusal force, and occlusal contact area in patients with bilaterally missing molars and distal extension removable partial dentures.
    Aras K; Hasanreisoğlu U; Shinogaya T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 19418870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: zygomatic versus conventional implants.
    Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Martí E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17974111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implant-retained dentures for full-arch rehabilitation: a case report comparing fixed and removable restorations.
    Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffman O
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(4):e137-43. PubMed ID: 21903551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Provisional implants for immediate restoration of partially edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 18807570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prosthodontic complications in a prospective clinical trial of single-stage implants at 36 months.
    Duncan JP; Nazarova E; Vogiatzi T; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):561-5. PubMed ID: 12939009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures.
    Allen PF; McMillan AS; Walshaw D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11208203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses.
    Batista M; Bonachela W; Soares J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 18422982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis.
    Becker CM
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 15202588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of number and distribution of occlusal cantilever contacts on closing and chewing forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed prostheses occluding with complete dentures.
    Lundgren D; Falk H; Laurell L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 2639855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maximum bite force following unilateral implant-supported prosthetic treatment: within-subject comparison to opposite dentate side.
    Al-Omiri MK; Sghaireen MG; Alhijawi MM; Alzoubi IA; Lynch CD; Lynch E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 41(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 24720815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electromyographic assessment of jaw muscles in patients with All-on-Four fixed implant-supported prostheses.
    Dellavia C; Francetti L; Rosati R; Corbella S; Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 39(12):896-904. PubMed ID: 22957827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.