44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297878)
1. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Interaural Differences, Head Shadow, and Binaural Redundancy in Binaural Intelligibility Benefits Among School-Aged Children.
Ellen Peng Z; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211045313. PubMed ID: 34609935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Kalluri S; Blanco JL; Lopez-Poveda EA
Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of a short-time version of the Equalization-Cancellation model to speech intelligibility experiments with speech maskers.
Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):768-76. PubMed ID: 25096111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.
Hopkins K; Moore BC; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1140-53. PubMed ID: 18247914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dynamic binaural harmonic-cancellation model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker varying in intonation, temporal envelope, and location.
Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108535. PubMed ID: 35654633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
Warnecke M; Litovsky RY
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of spatial configuration and fundamental frequency on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions in the ipsilateral horizontal plane and median planea).
Yao D; Zhao J; Wang L; Shang Z; Gu J; Wang Y; Jia M; Li J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):2934-2947. PubMed ID: 38717201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the role of harmonic cancellation in speech-on-speech masking.
Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108562. PubMed ID: 35768309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
Zhou X; Sobczak GS; McKay CM; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267588. PubMed ID: 35468160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of temporal cues, point-light displays, and faces on speech identification and listening effort.
Sewell K; Brown VA; Farwell G; Rogers M; Zhang X; Strand JF
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0290826. PubMed ID: 38019831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Progress made in the efficacy and viability of deep-learning-based noise reduction.
Healy EW; Johnson EM; Pandey A; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2751. PubMed ID: 37133814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural Signal Processing in Hearing Aids.
Derleth P; Georganti E; Latzel M; Courtois G; Hofbauer M; Raether J; Kuehnel V
Semin Hear; 2021 Aug; 42(3):206-223. PubMed ID: 34594085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masked speech recognition by 6-13-year-olds with early-childhood otitis media: effects of acoustic condition and otologic history.
Koiek S; Brandt C; Möller S; Dillon H; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2024 May; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38767554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interrupted mosaic speech revisited: Gain and loss in intelligibility by stretchinga).
Ueda K; Hashimoto M; Takeichi H; Wakamiya K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Mar; 155(3):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 38441439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Erratum: Generalized perceptual adaptation to second-language speech: Variability, similarity, and intelligibility [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 154, 1601-1613 (2023)].
Bradlow AR; Bassard AM; Paller KA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2289. PubMed ID: 37830894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Erratum: Interrupted mosaic speech revisited: Gain and loss in intelligibility by stretching [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 155(3), 1767-1779 (2024)].
Ueda K; Hashimoto M; Takeichi H; Wakamiya K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):3014. PubMed ID: 38717214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dataset of directional room impulse responses for realistic speech data.
Fragner S; Pfeifenberger L; Hagmüller M; Pernkopf F
Data Brief; 2024 Apr; 53():110229. PubMed ID: 38445201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
