These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297910)

  • 1. Further examination of complex pitch perception in the absence of a place-rate match.
    Deeks JM; Gockel HE; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 23297910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.
    Shofner WP; Campbell J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL398-404. PubMed ID: 23145701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Long CJ; Deeks JM; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):621-33. PubMed ID: 12186042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of noise-vocoded tone complexes: A time domain analysis based on an auditory filterbank model.
    Shofner WP; Morris H; Mills M
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():1-16. PubMed ID: 30005269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of excitation-pattern cues in the detection of frequency shifts in bandpass-filtered complex tones.
    Marmel F; Plack CJ; Hopkins K; Carlyon RP; Gockel HE; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2687-97. PubMed ID: 25994700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):808-16. PubMed ID: 25234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands.
    Josupeit A; Hohmann V; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL450-5. PubMed ID: 23231207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.
    Smalt CJ; Krishnan A; Bidelman GM; Ananthakrishnan S; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 292(1-2):26-34. PubMed ID: 22910032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning to perceive pitch differences.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11931315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal coherence versus harmonicity in auditory stream formation.
    Micheyl C; Kreft H; Shamma S; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):EL188-94. PubMed ID: 23464127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss.
    Turner C; Burns EM; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 6841823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Just noticeable difference of tone pitch contour change for English- and Chinese-native listeners.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3011-20. PubMed ID: 24116436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived continuity and pitch shifts for complex tones with unresolved harmonics.
    Plack CJ; Watkinson RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1922-9. PubMed ID: 20968364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: an event-related potential study.
    Rao A; Zhang Y; Miller S
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):123-32. PubMed ID: 20595021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of excitation-pattern, temporal-fine-structure, and envelope cues in the discrimination of complex tones.
    Jackson HM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1356-70. PubMed ID: 24606274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.
    Santurette S; Dau T; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3883-95. PubMed ID: 23231119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
    Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.