These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297912)

  • 1. Monaural envelope correlation perception for bands narrower or wider than a critical band.
    Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):405-16. PubMed ID: 23297912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wideband monaural envelope correlation perception.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():383-90. PubMed ID: 23716244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.
    Grose JH; Buss E; Porter HL; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1205-14. PubMed ID: 23927119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands.
    Josupeit A; Hohmann V; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL450-5. PubMed ID: 23231207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masked detection and discrimination of tone sequences under conditions of monaural and binaural masking release.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1482-9. PubMed ID: 21428512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.
    Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2467-78. PubMed ID: 19894827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical bandwidth determined by masking in the presence of two narrow-band noises.
    Ishigami H; Suzuki T; Isojima G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1995; 22(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7677630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of envelope fluctuations in an apparent demonstration of suppression in simultaneous masking.
    Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3436-42. PubMed ID: 1619119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1699-703. PubMed ID: 6520307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of frequency selectivity on comodulation masking release in normal-hearing listeners.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Moore BC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):410-23. PubMed ID: 8487531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Narrow noise band detection in a complex masker: masking level difference due to harmonicity.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):225-35. PubMed ID: 21820501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers.
    Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monaural envelope correlation perception, revisited: effects of bandwidth, frequency separation, duration, and relative level of the noise bands.
    Moore BC; Emmerich DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2628-33. PubMed ID: 2373797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):808-16. PubMed ID: 25234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of stimulus bandwidth and duration on monaural envelope correlation perception.
    Buss E; Dai H; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL51-7. PubMed ID: 25618099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms.
    Borrill SJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):309-19. PubMed ID: 11833537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Components of monaural envelope correlation perception.
    Richards VM
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 3182409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.