BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297919)

  • 1. The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; McAuliffe MJ; Liss JM; O'Beirne GA; Anderson TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):474-82. PubMed ID: 23297919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A follow-up investigation into the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; McAuliffe MJ; Liss JM; O'Beirne GA; Anderson TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL102-8. PubMed ID: 22894306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
    McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing Relationships Between Language-Being-Spoken and Other Speech Dimensions in Monolingual and Bilingual Listeners.
    Vaughn CR; Bradlow AR
    Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):530-561. PubMed ID: 29216813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; Baese-Berk M; Van Engen K; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4660. PubMed ID: 28679257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive-perceptual examination of remediation approaches to hypokinetic dysarthria.
    McAuliffe MJ; Kerr SE; Gibson EM; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1268-83. PubMed ID: 24687031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Familiarisation conditions and the mechanisms that underlie improved recognition of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; McAuliffe MJ; Liss JM; Kirk C; O'Beirne GA; Anderson T
    Lang Cogn Process; 2012 Sep; 27(7-8):1039-1055. PubMed ID: 24009401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regularity Matters: Unpredictable Speech Degradation Inhibits Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.
    Lansford KL; Borrie SA; Barrett TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4282-4290. PubMed ID: 31747531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of familiarization on intelligibility and lexical segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria.
    Liss JM; Spitzer SM; Caviness JN; Adler C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3022-30. PubMed ID: 12509024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expectations and speech intelligibility.
    Babel M; Russell J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2823-33. PubMed ID: 25994710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic correlates of vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ferguson SH; Quené H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3570-84. PubMed ID: 24907820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Leeper HA; Kotler AL; Thomas-Stonell N; O'Neill C; Dylke MC; Rolls K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jul; 34(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
    Başkent D; Chatterjee M
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
    Janse E; Newman RS
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarization Effects on Consonant Intelligibility in Dysarthric Speech.
    Kim H
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(5):245-52. PubMed ID: 26906426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clear speech and lexical competition in younger and older adult listeners.
    Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1067. PubMed ID: 28863602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
    Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.