These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23297921)
1. Auditory training of speech recognition with interrupted and continuous noise maskers by children with hearing impairment. Sullivan JR; Thibodeau LM; Assmann PF J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):495-501. PubMed ID: 23297921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability. Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity. Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids. Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Dillon H; Carter L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 21303017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use. Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid. de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of dosage and duration of auditory training for older adults with hearing impairment. Humes LE; Kinney DL; Brown SE; Kiener AL; Quigley TM J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):EL224. PubMed ID: 25190425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners. Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow. Nittrouer S; Caldwell-Tarr A; Tarr E; Lowenstein JH; Rice C; Moberly AC Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):513-25. PubMed ID: 23834373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction. Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem. Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Picou EM; Ricketts TA Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired. Stone MA; Anton K; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1141-51. PubMed ID: 22894233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]