130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2329798)
1. Consistency of fundamental frequency and perturbation in repeated phonations of sustained vowels, reading, and connected speech.
Fitch JL
J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 May; 55(2):360-3. PubMed ID: 2329798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability.
Diercks GR; Ojha S; Infusino S; Maurer R; Hartnick CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of Speech Fundamental Frequencies for Different Tasks in Japanese.
Sotome T; Kanazawa T; Konomi U; Maeara N; Misawa K; Takahashi S; Fukaura J; Watanabe Y
J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):299.e1-299.e8. PubMed ID: 33455851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech.
Parsa V; Jamieson DG
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):327-39. PubMed ID: 11324655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Acoustic voice analysis: reliability of a set of multi-dimensional parameters].
González J; Cervera T; Miralles JL
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2002 Apr; 53(4):256-68. PubMed ID: 12185903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vocal Acoustics and Aerodynamics During Scripted Reading Compared to Spontaneous Speech.
Gilman M; Shelly S; Gillespie AI
J Voice; 2023 Jul; 37(4):539-545. PubMed ID: 34175170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement.
Bielamowicz S; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Dauer MS; Berke GS
J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Feb; 39(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 8820704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeated measures of vocal fundamental frequency perturbation obtained using the Visi-Pitch.
Dwire A; McCauley R
J Voice; 1995 Jun; 9(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 7620538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures.
Askenfelt AG; Hammarberg B
J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Mar; 29(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 3702379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of high precision F0 extraction algorithms for sustained vowels.
Parsa V; Jamieson DG
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):112-26. PubMed ID: 10025548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
Franca MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Mandarin Chinese Reading Passage for Eliciting Significant Vocal Range Variations.
Yen YZ; Wu CH; Chan RW
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1117-1135. PubMed ID: 33820432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-evaluation in Patients With Voice Disorders.
Lopes LW; da Silva JD; Simões LB; Evangelista DDS; Silva POC; Almeida AA; de Lima-Silva MFB
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119.e1-119.e10. PubMed ID: 27049448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
