These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298018)

  • 21. Long-term average spectra of adult Iranian speakers' voice.
    Moradi N; Maroufi N; Bijankhan M; Nik TH; Salavati M; Jalayer T; Latifi SM; Soltani M
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 24238703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aerodynamic measures of speech in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) patients.
    Pinho CM; Jesus LM; Barney A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Apr; 38(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 22741532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability of objective voice measures of normal speaking voices.
    Leong K; Hawkshaw MJ; Dentchev D; Gupta R; Lurie D; Sataloff RT
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 23280378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability, stability, and sensitivity to change and impairment in acoustic measures of timing and frequency.
    Vogel AP; Fletcher J; Snyder PJ; Fredrickson A; Maruff P
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 20171828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cepstral analysis of voice in unilateral adductor vocal fold palsy.
    Balasubramanium RK; Bhat JS; Fahim S; Raju R
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):326-9. PubMed ID: 20346619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech and voice range profiles of adults with untrained normal voices: methodological implications.
    Sanchez K; Oates J; Dacakis G; Holmberg EB
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2014 Jul; 39(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 23590284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Ternström S; Yiu E; Heard R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):259.e1-259.e12. PubMed ID: 27342753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing measurement errors for formants in synthetic and natural vowels.
    Shadle CH; Nam H; Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):713-27. PubMed ID: 26936555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs.
    Morrison GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2387-97. PubMed ID: 19354412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotional speech acoustic model for Malay: iterative versus isolated unit training.
    Mustafa MB; Ainon RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3057-66. PubMed ID: 24116440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voice onset time production in older and younger female monozygotic twins.
    Ryalls J; Shaw H; Simon M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15087572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of voice-onset time in continuous speech using temporal measures.
    Prathosh AP; Ramakrishnan AG; Ananthapadmanabha TV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL122-8. PubMed ID: 25096135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
    Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gender classification in children based on speech characteristics: using fundamental and formant frequencies of Malay vowels.
    Zourmand A; Ting HN; Mirhassani SM
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 23473455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
    Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cepstral analysis of voice in persons with vocal nodules.
    Radish Kumar B; Bhat JS; Prasad N
    J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):651-3. PubMed ID: 20171835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.