These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298020)

  • 1. Physiological evidence for auditory modulation filterbanks: cortical responses to concurrent modulations.
    Xiang J; Poeppel D; Simon JZ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL7-12. PubMed ID: 23298020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory steady state cortical responses indicate deviant phonemic-rate processing in adults with dyslexia.
    Poelmans H; Luts H; Vandermosten M; Boets B; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 21844810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual temporal encoding mechanisms in human auditory cortex: Evidence from MEG and EEG.
    Tang H; Crain S; Johnson BW
    Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():32-43. PubMed ID: 26763154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Representation of the vocal roughness of aperiodic speech sounds in the auditory cortex.
    Yrttiaho S; Alku P; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3177-85. PubMed ID: 19425660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory steady-state responses to monaural and diotic stimulation.
    Poelmans H; Luts H; Vandermosten M; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 13(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 22926721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical auditory responses index the contributions of different RMS-level-dependent segments to speech intelligibility.
    Wang L; Li H; Wu EX; Chen F
    Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107808. PubMed ID: 31606583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust cortical encoding of slow temporal modulations of speech.
    Ding N; Simon JZ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():373-81. PubMed ID: 23716243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural representations of complex temporal modulations in the human auditory cortex.
    Ding N; Simon JZ
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov; 102(5):2731-43. PubMed ID: 19692508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental evaluation of atypical auditory sampling in dyslexia: Functional and structural evidence.
    Lizarazu M; Lallier M; Molinaro N; Bourguignon M; Paz-Alonso PM; Lerma-Usabiaga G; Carreiras M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Dec; 36(12):4986-5002. PubMed ID: 26356682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human cortical dynamics determined by speech fundamental frequency.
    Mäkelä AM; Alku P; Mäkinen V; Valtonen J; May P; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1300-5. PubMed ID: 12414269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectrotemporal modulation provides a unifying framework for auditory cortical asymmetries.
    Flinker A; Doyle WK; Mehta AD; Devinsky O; Poeppel D
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 3(4):393-405. PubMed ID: 30971792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Syllabic (∼2-5 Hz) and fluctuation (∼1-10 Hz) ranges in speech and auditory processing.
    Edwards E; Chang EF
    Hear Res; 2013 Nov; 305():113-34. PubMed ID: 24035819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplitude modulation rate dependent topographic organization of the auditory steady-state response in human auditory cortex.
    Weisz N; Lithari C
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():102-108. PubMed ID: 28917446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
    Scharinger M; Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):903-18. PubMed ID: 22232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hari R; Möttönen R; Rauschecker JP; Sams M
    J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 30(4):1314-21. PubMed ID: 20107058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing.
    Doelling KB; Arnal LH; Ghitza O; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 2(0 2):761-8. PubMed ID: 23791839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.