131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298081)
1. Impact of the fixed gantry angle approximation on dosimetric accuracy for helical tomotherapy plans.
Tudor GS; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011711. PubMed ID: 23298081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.
Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system.
Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen.
Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment plans for total marrow irradiation created using GPU and CPU dose calculation engines.
Nalichowski A; Burmeister J
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071716. PubMed ID: 23822420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose calculation software for helical tomotherapy, utilizing patient CT data to calculate an independent three-dimensional dose cube.
Thomas SJ; Eyre KR; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 22225285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of helical tomotherapy for partial-breast irradiation of prone-positioned patients.
Kainz K; White J; Herman J; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 19362247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the number of discrete angles used during dose computation for TomoTherapy treatments.
Sterpin E; Verboomen C; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6947-56. PubMed ID: 23127088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The dosimetric effect of zipper artifacts on tomotherapy adaptive dose calculation--a phantom study.
Geng H; Yu SK; Lam WW; Wong WK; Ho YW; Liu SF
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 21093252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT stereotactic body radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation for a real-time SBRT treatment planning and delivery program.
Dunlap N; McIntosh A; Sheng K; Yang W; Turner B; Shoushtari A; Sheehan J; Jones DR; Lu W; Ruchala K; Olivera G; Parnell D; Larner JL; Benedict SH; Read PW
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 21055611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of changing modulation and pitch parameters on tomotherapy delivery quality assurance plans.
Binny D; Lancaster CM; Harris S; Sylvander SR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):87–105. PubMed ID: 26699293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvements in dose calculation accuracy for small off-axis targets in high dose per fraction tomotherapy.
Hardcastle N; Bayliss A; Wong JH; Rosenfeld AB; Tomé WA
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4788-94. PubMed ID: 22894403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of different IMRT techniques on the peripheral dose: a comparison between sMLM-IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Wiezorek T; Schwahofer A; Schubert K
Strahlenther Onkol; 2009 Oct; 185(10):696-702. PubMed ID: 19806336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo calculation of VMAT, 3DCRT, step-shoot IMRT, and helical tomotherapy dose distributions using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc.
Belec J; Ploquin N; La Russa DJ; Clark BG
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):948-60. PubMed ID: 21452731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose calculation for hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy: approximating continuous arc delivery and tongue-and-groove modeling.
Yang J; Tang G; Zhang P; Hunt M; Lim SB; LoSasso T; Mageras G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):3-13. PubMed ID: 27074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculation of tomotherapy and cyberknife treatment planning systems: a dosimetric study.
Schneider U; Hälg RA; Hartmann M; Mack A; Storelli F; Joosten A; Möckli R; Besserer J
Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 24290992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of CT contrast on volumetric arc therapy planning (RapidArc and helical tomotherapy) for head and neck cancer.
Liu AJ; Vora N; Suh S; Liu A; Schultheiss TE; Wong JY
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 25242679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
