132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298086)
1. Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT.
Bangert M; Ziegenhein P; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011716. PubMed ID: 23298086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing the combinatorial beam angle selection problem.
Bangert M; Ziegenhein P; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6707-23. PubMed ID: 23023092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time.
Wild E; Bangert M; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2157-68. PubMed ID: 25979010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated generation of IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients with metal hip prostheses: comparison of different planning strategies.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071704. PubMed ID: 23822408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accelerated iterative beam angle selection in IMRT.
Bangert M; Unkelbach J
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1073-82. PubMed ID: 26936695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.
Yuan L; Zhu W; Ge Y; Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135024. PubMed ID: 29846178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.
Zhang S; Yang R; Shi C; Li J; Zhuang H; Tian S; Wang J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819871621. PubMed ID: 31451059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Gillin M; Ahamad A; Ang K; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 16168851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A derivative-free multistart framework for an automated noncoplanar beam angle optimization in IMRT.
Rocha H; Dias J; Ventura T; Ferreira B; Lopes MD
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5514. PubMed ID: 27782716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk.
Bratengeier K; Holubyev K
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():207. PubMed ID: 26458947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coplanar VMAT vs. noncoplanar VMAT in the treatment of sinonasal cancer.
Zhong-Hua N; Jing-Ting J; Xiao-Dong L; Jin-Ming M; Jun-Chong M; Jian-Xue J; Ming G; Qi-Lin L; Wen-Dong G; Lu-Jun C; Hong-Lei P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2015 Jan; 191(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 25293728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coplanar versus noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for fronto-temporal high-grade glioma.
Panet-Raymond V; Ansbacher W; Zavgorodni S; Bendorffe B; Nichol A; Truong PT; Beckham W; Vlachaki M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 13(4):3826. PubMed ID: 22766954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Multiple Treatment Planning Techniques for High-Grade Glioma Tumors Near to Critical Organs.
Bas Ayata H; Ceylan C; Kılıç A; Güden M; Engin K
Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(9):514-519. PubMed ID: 30086547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung tumors: a comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques.
Holt A; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C; Mans A; Belderbos JS; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1560-7. PubMed ID: 21300461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A modular approach to intensity-modulated arc therapy optimization with noncoplanar trajectories.
Papp D; Bortfeld T; Unkelbach J
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(13):5179-98. PubMed ID: 26083759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison.
Hou Y; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Yv L; Liu K; Tian X; Lv Y
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Dec; 187():105573. PubMed ID: 31706107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
