These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2329821)

  • 1. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.
    Guerra F; Bortolotti U; Thiene G; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Talenti E; Stellin G; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
    Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
    Kawachi Y; Tanaka J; Tominaga R; Kinoshita K; Tokunaga K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy.
    Louagie Y; Noirhomme P; Aranguis E; Eucher P; Vanruyssevelt P; Buche M; Dion R; Jaumin P; Schoevaerdts JC; Chalant CH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
    Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Structural changes of Hancock bioprostheses in children (author's transl)].
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Callucci V; Valente M; Del Maschio A; Valfrè C; Thiene G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(11):1520-5. PubMed ID: 7202899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heart valve replacement--a report of 8- to 17-year follow-up.
    Kimura M; Kitasato K; Kamatani M
    Igaku Kenkyu; 1992 Apr; 62(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 1523944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitral valve replacement with Hancock porcine bioprostheses: up to 7-year follow-up.
    Brais MP; Bédard JP; Goldstein W; Koshal A; Keon WJ
    Can J Surg; 1985 Mar; 28(2):119-21, 123. PubMed ID: 3971234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a fabricated trileaflet porcine bioprosthesis. Midterm follow-up of the Hancock modified-orifice valve.
    DiSesa VJ; Allred EN; Kowalker W; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 3613620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.