These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298530)

  • 21. Do the early attentional components of ERPs reflect attentional bias in depression? It depends on the stimulus presentation time.
    Mingtian Z; Xiongzhao Z; Jinyao Y; Shuqiao Y; Atchley RA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jul; 122(7):1371-81. PubMed ID: 20961804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control.
    Böckler A; Alpay G; Stürmer B
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 20494861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect?
    Gut M; Szumska I; Wasilewska M; Jaśkowski P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do women with fragile X syndrome have problems in switching attention: preliminary findings from ERP and fMRI.
    Cornish K; Swainson R; Cunnington R; Wilding J; Morris P; Jackson G
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 15050782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anxiety and spatial attention moderate the electrocortical response to aversive pictures.
    MacNamara A; Hajcak G
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2975-80. PubMed ID: 19576234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotionally positive stimuli facilitate lexical decisions-an ERP study.
    Kissler J; Koessler S
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Mar; 86(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 21184799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Valence interacts with the early ERP old/new effect and arousal with the sustained ERP old/new effect for affective pictures.
    Van Strien JW; Langeslag SJ; Strekalova NJ; Gootjes L; Franken IH
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():223-35. PubMed ID: 19063866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1387-401. PubMed ID: 11707094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.
    Yuan J; Zhang Q; Chen A; Li H; Wang Q; Zhuang Z; Jia S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Sep; 45(12):2764-71. PubMed ID: 17548095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Positive emotion speeds up conflict processing: ERP responses in an auditory Simon task.
    Kanske P; Kotz SA
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 21382438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition.
    de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 18387590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Cohen JD
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 14693011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Music-induced mood modulates the strength of emotional negativity bias: an ERP study.
    Chen J; Yuan J; Huang H; Chen C; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 445(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 18771704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Stroop matching task presents conflict at both the response and nonresponse levels: an event-related potential and electromyography study.
    Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Souza LB; Motta-Ribeiro GC; David IA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1215-24. PubMed ID: 22748126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time course of social-emotional processing in early childhood: ERP responses to facial affect and personal familiarity in a Go-Nogo task.
    Todd RM; Lewis MD; Meusel LA; Zelazo PD
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):595-613. PubMed ID: 18061633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.