These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298579)
61. Is there a clinical application for tablet-based automated audiometry in children? Pereira O; Pasko LE; Supinski J; Hammond M; Morlet T; Nagao K Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 110():87-92. PubMed ID: 29859595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The accuracy and reliability of an app-based audiometer using consumer headphones: pure tone audiometry in a normal hearing group. Corry M; Sanders M; Searchfield GD Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):706-710. PubMed ID: 28485673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Audiometer and AudioScope hearing screening compared with threshold test in young children. Orlando MS; Frank T J Pediatr; 1987 Feb; 110(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 3806301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Tablet-based Hearing Screening in Children Aged 5 to 17 in Rural Dominican Republic. Levy DA; Hill DR; Bia FJ; Feinn RS Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):823-828. PubMed ID: 29995002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. High-frequency monitoring using an electrostimulation audiometer. Thornton AR; Bell IE; Phillipps JJ Br J Audiol; 1989 Feb; 23(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 2706409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The effect of ambient noise and other variables on pure tone threshold screening in a population of primary school entrants. Hallett CP; Gibbs AC Br J Audiol; 1983 Aug; 17(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 6357327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluation of Accuracy and Reliability of a Mobile Screening Audiometer in Normal Hearing Adults. Colsman A; Supp GG; Neumann J; Schneider TR Front Psychol; 2020; 11():744. PubMed ID: 32411050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Collapsing ears and acoustic reflex measurement with circumaural ear cushions. Riedner E; Shimizu H Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Jun; 102(6):358-62. PubMed ID: 1275804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Development of school screening audiometry. Fisch L Br J Audiol; 1981 May; 15(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 7013882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Electrodermal response, delayed auditory feedback, and lengthened off-time procedures. Comparison of use for medical-legal audiological assessment. Citron D; Reddell RC Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Apr; 102(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 1267703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Initial assessment of hearing loss using a mobile application for audiological evaluation. Derin S; Cam OH; Beydilli H; Acar E; Elicora SS; Sahan M J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Mar; 130(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 26781699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Auditory screening of kindergarten children using the VASC. Mencher GT; McCulloch BF J Speech Hear Disord; 1970 Aug; 35(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 5449500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. The reliability and precision of a modification of the ABLB test. Carver WF Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Apr; 79(2):398-411. PubMed ID: 5437654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. A calibration procedure for the assessment of thresholds above 8000 Hz. Stelmachowicz PG; Gorga MP; Cullen JK J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 7162165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Clinical comparison of two automated audiometry procedures. Liu H; Du B; Liu B; Fu X; Wang Y Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1011016. PubMed ID: 36303947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The value of noise-excluder shells in reducing overreferrals from a school audiometric screening program. Wall LG; Tillis CH Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1977 Jun; 16(6):530-2. PubMed ID: 862287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Presbyacusis. II. The effect of pulse duration and of the rate of intensity change on pure tone thresholds. Jokinen K Acta Otolaryngol; 1970 Mar; 69(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 5446883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]