These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298608)

  • 1. New procedures for uterine prolapse.
    Khunda A; Vashisht A; Cutner A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 23298608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Porcari I; Zorzato PC; Bosco M; Garzon S; Uccella S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):470-471. PubMed ID: 38760923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter to the Editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Husby KR; Klarskov N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):468-469. PubMed ID: 38736316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Pros and Cons of Hystero-preservation on Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.
    Chen CC; Peng IT; Wu MP
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(4):203-210. PubMed ID: 38034113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transposition of Cardinal Ligaments for Stages II-III Uterine Prolapse: A Minimally Invasive Procedure.
    Ramadan MK; Badr DA; Saheb W; Wehbeh G
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2018; 7(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 30254934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conservative surgical treatment for adenomyosis: New options for looking beyond uterus removal.
    Capezzuoli T; Toscano F; Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Stepniewska A; Fambrini M; Vannuccini S; Petraglia F
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Jul; 95():102507. PubMed ID: 38906739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different surgical techniques on postoperative wound infection in patients with uterine prolapse: A meta-analysis.
    Wang J; Shang X; Huang J; Wang J
    Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14588. PubMed ID: 38272813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. At the Scrub Sink: Uterine Preservation Surgery.
    Meyer I
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2024 Jun; 30(6):533-535. PubMed ID: 38775352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine displacement as fertility sparing technique for pelvic malignancies: Demonstration of the surgical options on a human cadaver.
    Pavone M; Lecointre L; Seeliger B; Bizzarri N; Marescaux J; Scambia G; Akladios C; Querleu D
    Gynecol Oncol Rep; 2024 Aug; 54():101436. PubMed ID: 39035034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine prolapse: from antiquity to today.
    Downing KT
    Obstet Gynecol Int; 2012; 2012():649459. PubMed ID: 22262975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new uterine mobilizer for laparoscopy: its use in 518 patients.
    Valtchev KL; Papsin FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Apr; 127(7):738-40. PubMed ID: 139826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift™ mesh.
    Huang LY; Chu LC; Chiang HJ; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25600353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
    Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women.
    Manonai J; Wattanayingcharoenchai R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 25029097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total pelvic floor reconstruction versus transvaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort.
    Shi RX; Sun HT
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 24992786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
    Iliev VN; Andonova IT
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.
    Kow N; Goldman HB; Ridgeway B
    Curr Urol Rep; 2013 Oct; 14(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 23700096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Results and complications of vaginal correction of vaginal and uterine prolapse with or without urinary incontinence; a prospective study].
    Milani AL; Flu PK; Vierhout ME; Wallenburg HC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 8433761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total abdominal hysterectomy at abdominal sacrovaginopexy: a comparative study.
    Fedorkow DM; Kalbfleisch RE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 169(3):641-3. PubMed ID: 8372874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine preservation in the surgical management of genuine stress urinary incontinence associated with uterovaginal prolapse.
    Nesbitt RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Feb; 168(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 2643189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.