BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298898)

  • 1. Women's acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour.
    Kehl S; Welzel G; Ehard A; Berlit S; Spaich S; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 May; 168(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 23298898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of misoprostol and mechanical dilation for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ehard A; Berlit S; Spaich S; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 21962943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():78-82. PubMed ID: 27525685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mode of delivery and its influence on women's satisfaction with childbirth.
    Spaich S; Welzel G; Berlit S; Temerinac D; Tuschy B; Sütterlin M; Kehl S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 23962715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone.
    Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J
    S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
    Place K; Kruit H; Rahkonen L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Oct; 101(10):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 35933726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Kehl S; Böhm L; Weiss C; Heimrich J; Dammer U; Baier F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 27642010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
    Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Ugwu EO; Onah HE; Obi SN; Dim CC; Okezie OA; Chigbu CO; Okoro OS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 33(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 23919853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misoprostol in Addition to a Double-Balloon Catheter for Induction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hill MG; Gonzalez MG; Lo-Ciganic WH; Reed KL
    Am J Perinatol; 2018 Feb; 35(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 28910848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction].
    Panelius E; Heikinheimo O; Rahkonen L
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(20):2093-102. PubMed ID: 23167168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.