These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23298898)

  • 21. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
    BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interest of cervical ripening using double balloon catheters for labour induction in term nulliparous women.
    Sulkowski C; Schneider F; Tessier V; Toullalan O; Grouin A
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 48(8):669-672. PubMed ID: 31075432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term.
    Nassar AH; Awwad J; Khalil AM; Abu-Musa A; Mehio G; Usta IM
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1215-21. PubMed ID: 17877674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Women's Experiences with and Preference for Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol or Foley Catheter at Term.
    Ten Eikelder ML; van de Meent MM; Mast K; Rengerink KO; Jozwiak M; de Graaf IM; Scholtenhuis MA; Roumen FJ; Porath MM; van Loon AJ; van den Akker ES; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Adriaanse AH; Muller MA; de Leeuw JW; Visser H; Woiski MD; Weerd SR; van Unnik GA; Pernet PJ; Versendaal H; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Am J Perinatol; 2017 Jan; 34(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 27341122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
    Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
    Lee HY
    Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol.
    Batukan C; Ozgun MT; Ozcelik B; Aygen E; Sahin Y; Turkyilmaz C
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 17681307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.