243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23300403)
1. A comparison of computational models for eukaryotic cell shape and motility.
Holmes WR; Edelstein-Keshet L
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(12):e1002793. PubMed ID: 23300403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How cells integrate complex stimuli: the effect of feedback from phosphoinositides and cell shape on cell polarization and motility.
Marée AF; Grieneisen VA; Edelstein-Keshet L
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(3):e1002402. PubMed ID: 22396633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From simple to detailed models for cell polarization.
Edelstein-Keshet L; Holmes WR; Zajac M; Dutot M
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013; 368(1629):20130003. PubMed ID: 24062577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computational model of cell polarization and motility coupling mechanics and biochemistry.
Vanderlei B; Feng JJ; Edelstein-Keshet L
Multiscale Model Simul; 2011 Oct; 9(4):1420-1443. PubMed ID: 22904684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting in shape and swimming: the role of cortical forces and membrane heterogeneity in eukaryotic cells.
Wu H; de León MAP; Othmer HG
J Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 77(3):595-626. PubMed ID: 29480329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bridging from single to collective cell migration: A review of models and links to experiments.
Buttenschön A; Edelstein-Keshet L
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1008411. PubMed ID: 33301528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A free-boundary model of a motile cell explains turning behavior.
Nickaeen M; Novak IL; Pulford S; Rumack A; Brandon J; Slepchenko BM; Mogilner A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005862. PubMed ID: 29136638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell.
McGarry JG; Prendergast PJ
Eur Cell Mater; 2004 Apr; 7():27-33; discussion 33-4. PubMed ID: 15095253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model.
Shao D; Levine H; Rappel WJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 May; 109(18):6851-6. PubMed ID: 22493219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Asymmetry between pushing and pulling for crawling cells.
Recho P; Truskinovsky L
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Feb; 87(2):022720. PubMed ID: 23496561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytoplasm dynamics and cell motion: two-phase flow models.
Alt W; Dembo M
Math Biosci; 1999 Mar; 156(1-2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10204394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape.
Barnhart EL; Lee KC; Keren K; Mogilner A; Theriot JA
PLoS Biol; 2011 May; 9(5):e1001059. PubMed ID: 21559321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating spatial constraints in cellular assembly processes using a monte carlo approach.
Puskar K; Ta 'asan S; Schwartz R; LeDuc PR
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2006; 45(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 16757820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bio-chemo-mechanical models for nuclear deformation in adherent eukaryotic cells.
Nava MM; Raimondi MT; Pietrabissa R
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Oct; 13(5):929-43. PubMed ID: 24549395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More than just a barrier: using physical models to couple membrane shape to cell function.
Frey F; Idema T
Soft Matter; 2021 Apr; 17(13):3533-3549. PubMed ID: 33503097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational cell model based on autonomous cell movement regulated by cell-cell signalling successfully recapitulates the "inside and outside" pattern of cell sorting.
Maeda TT; Ajioka I; Nakajima K
BMC Syst Biol; 2007 Sep; 1():43. PubMed ID: 17883828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrodynamic effects on the motility of crawling eukaryotic cells.
Mai MH; Camley BA
Soft Matter; 2020 Feb; 16(5):1349-1358. PubMed ID: 31934705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of traction forces associated with shape changes during amoeboid cell migration.
Alonso-Latorre B; Meili R; Bastounis E; Del Alamo JC; Firtel R; Lasheras JC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3346-9. PubMed ID: 19964075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuum model of cell adhesion and migration.
Kuusela E; Alt W
J Math Biol; 2009 Jan; 58(1-2):135-61. PubMed ID: 18488227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cytoskeleton, cellular motility and the reductionist agenda.
Pollard TD
Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6933):741-5. PubMed ID: 12700767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
