BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23300688)

  • 1. Binding pocket optimization by computational protein design.
    Malisi C; Schumann M; Toussaint NC; Kageyama J; Kohlbacher O; Höcker B
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52505. PubMed ID: 23300688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PocketOptimizer and the Design of Ligand Binding Sites.
    Stiel AC; Nellen M; Höcker B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1414():63-75. PubMed ID: 27094286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PocketOptimizer 2.0: A modular framework for computer-aided ligand-binding design.
    Noske J; Kynast JP; Lemm D; Schmidt S; Höcker B
    Protein Sci; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e4516. PubMed ID: 36403089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Development and validation of programs for ligand-binding-pocket search].
    Oda A
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2011; 131(10):1429-35. PubMed ID: 21963969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding.
    Wierbowski SD; Wingert BM; Zheng J; Camacho CJ
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 31721338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 3. A two-dimensional knowledge-based hydrogen-bonding potential for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Zheng M; Xiong B; Luo C; Li S; Liu X; Shen Q; Li J; Zhu W; Luo X; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2994-3004. PubMed ID: 21999432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins.
    Tinberg CE; Khare SD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():363-373. PubMed ID: 27914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive survey of small-molecule binding pockets in proteins.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003302. PubMed ID: 24204237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity.
    Tinberg CE; Khare SD; Dou J; Doyle L; Nelson JW; Schena A; Jankowski W; Kalodimos CG; Johnsson K; Stoddard BL; Baker D
    Nature; 2013 Sep; 501(7466):212-216. PubMed ID: 24005320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
    Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational resources for protein modelling and drug discovery applications.
    Dhaliwal B; Chen YW
    Infect Disord Drug Targets; 2009 Nov; 9(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 19594423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
    He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein-ligand binding region prediction (PLB-SAVE) based on geometric features and CUDA acceleration.
    Lo YT; Wang HW; Pai TW; Tzou WS; Hsu HH; Chang HT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S4. PubMed ID: 23514235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins.
    Yang W; Lai L
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2017 Aug; 45():67-73. PubMed ID: 27951448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.