These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23301185)

  • 1. Evolution of reproductive isolation as a by-product of divergent life-history evolution in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    M Ghosh S; Joshi A
    Ecol Evol; 2012 Dec; 2(12):3214-26. PubMed ID: 23301185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of reproductive isolation in a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila melanogaster: 30 years of divergent life-history selection.
    Robinson CE; Thyagarajan H; Chippindale AK
    Evolution; 2023 Jul; 77(8):1756-1768. PubMed ID: 37256776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postmating-prezygotic isolation between two allopatric populations of Drosophila montana: fertilisation success differs under sperm competition.
    Ala-Honkola O; Ritchie MG; Veltsos P
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(6):1679-91. PubMed ID: 27087932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular evolution of candidate genes involved in post-mating-prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Hoang K; Brandsmeier L
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 25522894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Rate of Evolution of Postmating-Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in Drosophila.
    Turissini DA; McGirr JA; Patel SS; David JR; Matute DR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Feb; 35(2):312-334. PubMed ID: 29048573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seminal fluid protein divergence among populations exhibiting postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Garlovsky MD; Evans C; Rosenow MA; Karr TL; Snook RR
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4428-4441. PubMed ID: 32939895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divergent selection on behavioural and chemical traits between reproductively isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Jin B; Barbash DA; Castillo DM
    J Evol Biol; 2022 May; 35(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 35411988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 16780504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental evolution: Assortative mating and sexual selection, independent of local adaptation, lead to reproductive isolation in the nematode Caenorhabditis remanei.
    Castillo DM; Burger MK; Lively CM; Delph LF
    Evolution; 2015 Dec; 69(12):3141-55. PubMed ID: 26542312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cryptic male mate choice for high-quality females reduces male postcopulatory success in future matings.
    Anastasio OE; Sinclair CS; Pischedda A
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(6):1396-1407. PubMed ID: 37073992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GENETIC CORRELATIONS BETWEEN LIFE-HISTORY AND BEHAVIORAL TRAITS CAN CAUSE REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION.
    Miyatake T; Shimizu T
    Evolution; 1999 Feb; 53(1):201-208. PubMed ID: 28565193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Jennings JH; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3095-108. PubMed ID: 25302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 15212383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sperm performance in conspecific and heterospecific female fluid.
    Cramer ER; Stensrud E; Marthinsen G; Hogner S; Johannessen LE; Laskemoen T; Eybert MC; Slagsvold T; Lifjeld JT; Johnsen A
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(5):1363-77. PubMed ID: 26855769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.
    Anholt RRH; O'Grady P; Wolfner MF; Harbison ST
    Genetics; 2020 Jan; 214(1):49-73. PubMed ID: 31907301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.