BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23301442)

  • 1. A reduction in radiographic exposure and image quality in film screen postero-anterior chest radiography.
    Egbe NO; Egong EA; Ekpo EU; Inah GB
    Niger J Med; 2012; 21(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23301442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H; Chapot C
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
    Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
    Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations.
    Ravenel JG; Scalzetti EM; Huda W; Garrisi W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 11461845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
    Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiation exposure in abdominal radiography with digital luminescence radiography and conventional screen-film system: an experimental animal study].
    Seifert H; Schneider G; Kubale R; Blass G; Kramann B; Leetz HK
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 8963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L
    Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Schindera ST; Graca P; Patak MA; Abderhalden S; von Allmen G; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
    Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.