These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23301635)

  • 1. Approximate Bayesian computation for modular inference problems with many parameters: the example of migration rates.
    Aeschbacher S; Futschik A; Beaumont MA
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):987-1002. PubMed ID: 23301635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing between population bottleneck and population subdivision by a Bayesian model choice procedure.
    Peter BM; Wegmann D; Excoffier L
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(21):4648-60. PubMed ID: 20735743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel approach for choosing summary statistics in approximate Bayesian computation.
    Aeschbacher S; Beaumont MA; Futschik A
    Genetics; 2012 Nov; 192(3):1027-47. PubMed ID: 22960215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximate Bayesian computation with functional statistics.
    Soubeyrand S; Carpentier F; Guiton F; Klein EK
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Mar; 12(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 23446870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Coalescent-based estimation of population parameters when the number of demes changes over time.
    Ewing G; Rodrigo A;
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16495347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colonization history of the Swiss Rhine basin by the bullhead (Cottus gobio): inference under a Bayesian spatially explicit framework.
    Neuenschwander S; Largiadèr CR; Ray N; Currat M; Vonlanthen P; Excoffier L
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Feb; 17(3):757-72. PubMed ID: 18194169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters.
    Beerli P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 16317072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we continue to neglect genomic variation in introgression rates when inferring the history of speciation? A case study in a Mytilus hybrid zone.
    Roux C; Fraïsse C; Castric V; Vekemans X; Pogson GH; Bierne N
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1662-75. PubMed ID: 24913446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for estimating the fixation time of an advantageous allele in stepping-stone models.
    Hartfield M
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1751-64. PubMed ID: 22805049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian estimation of recent migration rates after a spatial expansion.
    Hamilton G; Currat M; Ray N; Heckel G; Beaumont M; Excoffier L
    Genetics; 2005 May; 170(1):409-17. PubMed ID: 15716508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of parameters for macroparasite population evolution using approximate bayesian computation.
    Drovandi CC; Pettitt AN
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 20345496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On optimal selection of summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation.
    Nunes MA; Balding DJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article34. PubMed ID: 20887273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ABCtoolbox: a versatile toolkit for approximate Bayesian computations.
    Wegmann D; Leuenberger C; Neuenschwander S; Excoffier L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():116. PubMed ID: 20202215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring introduction routes of invasive species using approximate Bayesian computation on microsatellite data.
    Guillemaud T; Beaumont MA; Ciosi M; Cornuet JM; Estoup A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Jan; 104(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 19654609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kernel approximate Bayesian computation in population genetic inferences.
    Nakagome S; Fukumizu K; Mano S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Dec; 12(6):667-78. PubMed ID: 24150124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the use of kernel approximate Bayesian computation to infer population history.
    Nakagome S
    Genes Genet Syst; 2015; 90(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 26510570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a bayesian coalescent method of species delimitation.
    Zhang C; Zhang DX; Zhu T; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):747-61. PubMed ID: 21876212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stepwise mutation likelihood computation by sequential importance sampling in subdivided population models.
    De Iorio M; Griffiths RC; Leblois R; Rousset F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Jul; 68(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15890376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating demographic parameters from large-scale population genomic data using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Li S; Jakobsson M
    BMC Genet; 2012 Mar; 13():22. PubMed ID: 22453034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Population divergence with or without admixture: selecting models using an ABC approach.
    Sousa VC; Beaumont MA; Fernandes P; Coelho MM; Chikhi L
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 May; 108(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 22146980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.