These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2330208)

  • 1. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart.
    Elliott DB; Sanderson K; Conkey A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in Zaire.
    Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D; Spileers W; Missotten L
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1996; 263():87-90. PubMed ID: 9396193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia.
    Bradley A; Hook J; Haeseker J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Jul; 11(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 1766685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
    Rijal S; Cheng H; Marsack JD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Sep; 41(5):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 34418124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interocular differences in visual function in normal subjects.
    Wood JM; Bullimore MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Nov; 16(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 8944198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?
    Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Funaro E; Martelli M; Naroo SA
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1473-1484. PubMed ID: 28639086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mesopic Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and MP-1 microperimetry in healthy ageing and age-related macular degeneration.
    Maynard ML; Zele AJ; Feigl B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 94(8):e772-e778. PubMed ID: 27225020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The influence of IOL implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision 2 and 4 months after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 Apr; 62(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16640052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different forms of monocular occlusion on measures of central visual function.
    Wildsoet C; Wood J; Maag H; Sabdia S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 9829113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Converting LEA to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score in neuro-ophthalmology patients.
    Prihatningtias R; Hardiyanti D; Valencia L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 72(Suppl 3):S505-S508. PubMed ID: 38648459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
    Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards.
    Osman M; Njeru SM; Hopkins GR; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 98(9):1070-1077. PubMed ID: 34570031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.