These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23302096)

  • 41. Incorporating the patient perspective: a critical review of clinical practice guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.
    Joyce KE; Lord S; Matlock DD; McComb JM; Thomson R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 36(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 23250540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Presentation of Benefits and Harms in US Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines: Systematic Review.
    Caverly TJ; Hayward RA; Reamer E; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Connochie D; Heisler M; Fagerlin A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Jun; 108(6):djv436. PubMed ID: 26917630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Methodological Assessment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Tan MKH; Goodall R; Hughes W; Langridge B; Shalhoub J; Davies AH
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2020 Aug; 60(2):274-281. PubMed ID: 32636064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recommendations of high-quality clinical practice guidelines related to the process of starting dialysis: A systematic review.
    Salas-Gama K; Onakpoya IJ; Coronado Daza J; Perera R; Heneghan CJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0266202. PubMed ID: 35696388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines.
    Scott J; Howard B; Sinnett P; Schiesel M; Baker J; Henderson P; Vassar M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1828-1835. PubMed ID: 28623004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of natriuretic peptide recommendations in heart failure clinical practice guidelines.
    Simons JE; Don-Wauchope AC
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Jan; 49(1-2):8-15. PubMed ID: 26320006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A Critical Review of the Quality of Cough Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Jiang M; Guan WJ; Fang ZF; Xie YQ; Xie JX; Chen H; Wei D; Lai KF; Zhong NS
    Chest; 2016 Oct; 150(4):777-788. PubMed ID: 27164291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Guideline-based quality indicators-a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines.
    Becker M; Breuing J; Nothacker M; Deckert S; Brombach M; Schmitt J; Neugebauer E; Pieper D
    Implement Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 31288828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Do clinical practice guidelines consider evidence about diagnostic test consequences on patient-relevant outcomes? A critical document analysis.
    Tuut MK; Burgers JS; van der Weijden T; Langendam MW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 28(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 34553815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Benefit-harm analysis and charts for individualized and preference-sensitive prevention: example of low dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer.
    Puhan MA; Yu T; Stegeman I; Varadhan R; Singh S; Boyd CM
    BMC Med; 2015 Oct; 13():250. PubMed ID: 26423305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessment of the Quality of Current American Dental Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    London SD; Chamut S; Fontelo P; Iafolla T; Dye BA
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2023 Apr; 8(2):178-187. PubMed ID: 35369790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature.
    Bierbaum M; Rapport F; Arnolda G; Nic Giolla Easpaig B; Lamprell K; Hutchinson K; Delaney GP; Liauw W; Kefford R; Olver I; Braithwaite J
    Implement Sci; 2020 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 32460797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Statements considering intervention effects in Finnish clinical practice guidelines: Recommending interventions with non-numeric effect-sizes or unspecified outcomes.
    Raittio E; Raittio L
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2021 Aug; 27(4):751-758. PubMed ID: 32735367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review.
    Zhang Y; Li YX; Zhong DL; Liu XB; Zhu YY; Jin RJ; Li J
    BMJ Open; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e060767. PubMed ID: 35926987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations.
    Ng JY; Hanna C
    BMC Complement Med Ther; 2021 Sep; 21(1):236. PubMed ID: 34551759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Factors associated with higher quality of clinical practice guidelines and their recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of depression: a systematic review.
    Gabriel FC; de Melo DO; Stein AT; Fontes-Mota GCH; Dos Santos IB; Rodrigues CDS; Rodrigues MC; Ribeiro TB; Fráguas R; Florez ID; Telles-Correia D; Ribeiro E
    BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e067390. PubMed ID: 36997251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Content Analysis of Patient Versions.
    Santesso N; Morgano GP; Jack SM; Haynes RB; Hill S; Treweek S; Schünemann HJ;
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):692-702. PubMed ID: 27091380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Guidelines on vitamin D replacement in bariatric surgery: Identification and systematic appraisal.
    Chakhtoura MT; Nakhoul N; Akl EA; Mantzoros CS; El Hajj Fuleihan GA
    Metabolism; 2016 Apr; 65(4):586-97. PubMed ID: 26833101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of the quality of recommendations from 161 clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument shows there is room for improvement.
    Florez ID; Brouwers MC; Kerkvliet K; Spithoff K; Alonso-Coello P; Burgers J; Cluzeau F; Férvers B; Graham I; Grimshaw J; Hanna S; Kastner M; Kho M; Qaseem A; Straus S
    Implement Sci; 2020 Sep; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 32948216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.