These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23303511)

  • 1. Fragment recruitment on metabolic pathways: comparative metabolic profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes.
    Desai DK; Schunck H; Löser JW; Laroche J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 29(6):790-1. PubMed ID: 23303511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.
    Bose T; Haque MM; Reddy C; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142102. PubMed ID: 26561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FMAP: Functional Mapping and Analysis Pipeline for metagenomics and metatranscriptomics studies.
    Kim J; Kim MS; Koh AY; Xie Y; Zhan X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):420. PubMed ID: 27724866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEBS, a software platform to evaluate large (meta)genomic collections according to their metabolic machinery: unraveling the sulfur cycle.
    De Anda V; Zapata-Peñasco I; Poot-Hernandez AC; Eguiarte LE; Contreras-Moreira B; Souza V
    Gigascience; 2017 Nov; 6(11):1-17. PubMed ID: 29069412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional analysis of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes using SEED and KEGG.
    Mitra S; Rupek P; Richter DC; Urich T; Gilbert JA; Meyer F; Wilke A; Huson DH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21. PubMed ID: 21342551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degradation Network Reconstruction Guided by Metagenomic Data.
    Bargiela R; Ferrer M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1539():145-157. PubMed ID: 27900688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MetaComp: comprehensive analysis software for comparative meta-omics including comparative metagenomics.
    Zhai P; Yang L; Guo X; Wang Z; Guo J; Wang X; Zhu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):434. PubMed ID: 28969605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic inference of biochemical reactions in microbial communities from metagenomic sequences.
    Jiao D; Ye Y; Tang H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002981. PubMed ID: 23555216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vikodak--A Modular Framework for Inferring Functional Potential of Microbial Communities from 16S Metagenomic Datasets.
    Nagpal S; Haque MM; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148347. PubMed ID: 26848568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-source domain annotation pipeline for quantitative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic functional profiling.
    Ugarte A; Vicedomini R; Bernardes J; Carbone A
    Microbiome; 2018 Aug; 6(1):149. PubMed ID: 30153857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of multiple metagenomes using phylogenetic networks based on ecological indices.
    Mitra S; Gilbert JA; Field D; Huson DH
    ISME J; 2010 Oct; 4(10):1236-42. PubMed ID: 20428222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metatranscriptomic analysis of diverse microbial communities reveals core metabolic pathways and microbiome-specific functionality.
    Jiang Y; Xiong X; Danska J; Parkinson J
    Microbiome; 2016 Jan; 4():2. PubMed ID: 26757703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics.
    Sharifi F; Ye Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1611():27-34. PubMed ID: 28451969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets.
    Wu YW; Simmons BA; Singer SW
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):605-7. PubMed ID: 26515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes.
    Nayfach S; Camargo AP; Schulz F; Eloe-Fadrosh E; Roux S; Kyrpides NC
    Nat Biotechnol; 2021 May; 39(5):578-585. PubMed ID: 33349699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carnelian uncovers hidden functional patterns across diverse study populations from whole metagenome sequencing reads.
    Nazeen S; Yu YW; Berger B
    Genome Biol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):47. PubMed ID: 32093762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of internal standards for quantitative metatranscriptome and metagenome analysis.
    Satinsky BM; Gifford SM; Crump BC; Moran MA
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 531():237-50. PubMed ID: 24060124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ocean biogeochemistry modeled with emergent trait-based genomics.
    Coles VJ; Stukel MR; Brooks MT; Burd A; Crump BC; Moran MA; Paul JH; Satinsky BM; Yager PL; Zielinski BL; Hood RR
    Science; 2017 Dec; 358(6367):1149-1154. PubMed ID: 29191900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. KaPPA-View4: a metabolic pathway database for representation and analysis of correlation networks of gene co-expression and metabolite co-accumulation and omics data.
    Sakurai N; Ara T; Ogata Y; Sano R; Ohno T; Sugiyama K; Hiruta A; Yamazaki K; Yano K; Aoki K; Aharoni A; Hamada K; Yokoyama K; Kawamura S; Otsuka H; Tokimatsu T; Kanehisa M; Suzuki H; Saito K; Shibata D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jan; 39(Database issue):D677-84. PubMed ID: 21097783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MetCap: a bioinformatics probe design pipeline for large-scale targeted metagenomics.
    Kushwaha SK; Manoharan L; Meerupati T; Hedlund K; Ahrén D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 25880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.