These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23304285)

  • 1. Testing the calibration of classification models from first principles.
    Dreiseitl S; Osl M
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():164-9. PubMed ID: 23304285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
    Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
    Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.
    Kramer AA; Zimmerman JE
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Sep; 35(9):2052-6. PubMed ID: 17568333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models with continuous covariates.
    Pulkstenis E; Robinson TJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jan; 21(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 11782052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models.
    Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):709-20. PubMed ID: 26439593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology.
    Matheny ME; Ohno-Machado L; Resnic FS
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):367-75. PubMed ID: 16198996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration power of the Braden scale in predicting pressure ulcer development.
    Chen HL; Cao YJ; Wang J; Huai BS
    J Wound Care; 2016 Nov; 25(11):655-659. PubMed ID: 27827273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.
    Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3789-801. PubMed ID: 12483767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
    Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of outcome from intensive care: a prospective cohort study comparing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III prognostic systems in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.
    Beck DH; Taylor BL; Millar B; Smith GB
    Crit Care Med; 1997 Jan; 25(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 8989170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does EuroSCORE predict length of stay and specific postoperative complications after cardiac surgery?
    Toumpoulis IK; Anagnostopoulos CE; Swistel DG; DeRose JJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 27(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 15621484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reclassification calibration test for censored survival data: performance and comparison to goodness-of-fit criteria.
    Demler OV; Paynter NP; Cook NR
    Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():. PubMed ID: 30984876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibrating predictive model estimates to support personalized medicine.
    Jiang X; Osl M; Kim J; Ohno-Machado L
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 21984587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibrating models in economic evaluation: a comparison of alternative measures of goodness of fit, parameter search strategies and convergence criteria.
    Karnon J; Vanni T
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Jan; 29(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 21142278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration belt for quality-of-care assessment based on dichotomous outcomes.
    Finazzi S; Poole D; Luciani D; Cogo PE; Bertolini G
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16110. PubMed ID: 21373178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) and (PELOD-2) scores in a pediatric intensive care unit of a developing country.
    El-Nawawy A; Mohsen AA; Abdel-Malik M; Taman SO
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 176(7):849-855. PubMed ID: 28492972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests of calibration and goodness-of-fit in the survival setting.
    Demler OV; Paynter NP; Cook NR
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1659-80. PubMed ID: 25684707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pre-operative and intraoperative determinants for prolonged ventilation following adult cardiac surgery.
    Widyastuti Y; Stenseth R; Pleym H; Wahba A; Videm V
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 22091558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of different customization strategies in the performance of a general severity score.
    Moreno R; Apolone G
    Crit Care Med; 1997 Dec; 25(12):2001-8. PubMed ID: 9403750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.