121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23304290)
1. Optimization of an EHR mobile application using the UFuRT conceptual framework.
Amith M; Loubser PG; Chapman J; Zoker KC; Rabelo Ferreira FE
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():209-17. PubMed ID: 23304290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electronic health record on the go: Device form factor and Fitts' law.
Drews FA; Zadra JR; Gleed J
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Mar; 111():37-44. PubMed ID: 29425632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usability testing of Avoiding Diabetes Thru Action Plan Targeting (ADAPT) decision support for integrating care-based counseling of pre-diabetes in an electronic health record.
Chrimes D; Kitos NR; Kushniruk A; Mann DM
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Sep; 83(9):636-47. PubMed ID: 24981988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional analysis of interfaces in U.S. military electronic health record system using UFuRT framework.
Zhang Z; Walji MF; Patel VL; Gimbel RW; Zhang J
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2009 Nov; 2009():730-4. PubMed ID: 20351949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using a unified usability framework to dramatically improve the usability of an EMR Module.
Harrington C; Wood R; Breuer J; Pinzon O; Howell R; Pednekar M; Zhu M; Zhang J
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():549-58. PubMed ID: 22195110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care.
Schooley B; Walczak S; Hikmet N; Patel N
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Apr; 88():62-70. PubMed ID: 26878764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.
Ratwani RM; Zachary Hettinger A; Kosydar A; Fairbanks RJ; Hodgkins ML
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e35-e39. PubMed ID: 27375292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.
Ratwani RM; Hettinger AZ; Fairbanks RJ
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e191-e193. PubMed ID: 27572813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.
Russ AL; Saleem JJ
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():123-133. PubMed ID: 29329702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are informed policies in place to promote safe and usable EHRs? A cross-industry comparison.
Savage EL; Fairbanks RJ; Ratwani RM
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Jul; 24(4):769-775. PubMed ID: 28339697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electronic health record usability and workload changes over time for provider and nursing staff following transition to new EHR.
Dunn Lopez K; Chin CL; Leitão Azevedo RF; Kaushik V; Roy B; Schuh W; Banks K; Sousa V; Morrow D
Appl Ergon; 2021 May; 93():103359. PubMed ID: 33556884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operationalization of the UFuRT methodology for usability analysis in the clinical research data management domain.
Nahm M; Zhang J
J Biomed Inform; 2009 Apr; 42(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 19026765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not another box to check! Using the UTAUT to explore nurses' psychological adaptation to electronic health record usability.
Winckler D
Nurs Forum; 2022 May; 57(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 34957564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a cognitive framework of patient record summary review in the formative phase of user-centered design.
Horsky J; Ramelson HZ
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():147-157. PubMed ID: 27725292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR.
Walji MF; Kalenderian E; Piotrowski M; Tran D; Kookal KK; Tokede O; White JM; Vaderhobli R; Ramoni R; Stark PC; Kimmes NS; Lagerweij M; Patel VL
Int J Med Inform; 2014 May; 83(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 24583045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safeuristics! Do Heuristic Evaluation Violation Severity Ratings Correlate with Patient Safety Severity Ratings for a Native Electronic Health Record Mobile Application?
Kennedy B; Kerns E; Chan YR; Chaparro BS; Fouquet SD
Appl Clin Inform; 2019 Mar; 10(2):210-218. PubMed ID: 30919397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.
Yuan MJ; Finley GM; Long J; Mills C; Johnson RK
Interact J Med Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):e4. PubMed ID: 23612350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The E-health Literacy Demands of Australia's My Health Record: A Heuristic Evaluation of Usability.
Walsh L; Hemsley B; Allan M; Adams N; Balandin S; Georgiou A; Higgins I; McCarthy S; Hill S
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2017; 14(Fall):1f. PubMed ID: 29118683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
