These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2330433)

  • 1. How much cancer can EPA regulate away?
    Gough M
    Risk Anal; 1990 Mar; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2330433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk assessment. Agencies decry fuzzy science in bill.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Feb; 267(5201):1089-90. PubMed ID: 7855587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EPA assesses cancer risk due to childhood carcinogen exposure.
    Lindsey H
    Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):201. PubMed ID: 12681256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Carcinogen assessment jeopardised by new procedures.
    Furlow B
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 Jun; 9(6):518. PubMed ID: 18536121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis for carcinogens at EPA: a critique.
    Perera FP
    J Public Health Policy; 1987; 8(2):202-21. PubMed ID: 3116042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Losing the war against cancer: who's to blame and what to do about it.
    Epstein SS
    Int J Health Serv; 1990; 20(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 2407675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental factors in cancer: focus on air pollution.
    Chameides WL
    Rev Environ Health; 2010; 25(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20429154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trichloroethylene health risks--state of the science.
    Scott CS; Cogliano VJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 May; 108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):159-60. PubMed ID: 10928830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testimony of Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986.
    Moore JA
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 3786829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measures for the prevention of occupational cancer.
    Weaver NK
    J Occup Med; 1976 Sep; 18(9):607-10. PubMed ID: 966092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Troubled waters.
    Schrope M
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6899):718-20. PubMed ID: 12181537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reality versus extrapolation: an academic perspective of cancer risk regulation.
    Waddell WJ
    Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):181-95. PubMed ID: 8744595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NEPA, EPA and risk assessment: Has EPA lost its way?
    Calabrese EJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Nov; 64(2):267-8. PubMed ID: 22940525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The identification, assessment and control of environmental carcinogens in New South Wales and Australia.
    Billett J
    N S W Public Health Bull; 2002; 13(9-10):205-8. PubMed ID: 12555111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentistry in the 21st century: what can congress do? The lose-lose guidelines of federal regulations.
    Norwood C
    J Am Coll Dent; 1996; 63(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 8920062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EPA sets new policy on pesticide cancer risks.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 Oct; 242(4877):366-7. PubMed ID: 3175656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A call for more science in EPA regulations.
    Madia WJ
    Science; 1998 Oct; 282(5386):45. PubMed ID: 9786793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science and politics: the possible regulation of cancer promoters.
    Williams JR; Clark WL
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Apr; 50():351-4. PubMed ID: 6873026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why the delay in cancer-protection standards?
    Rose V
    Occup Health Saf; 1977; 46(3):49-50. PubMed ID: 194192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rationale developed by the Environmental Protection Agency for the assessment of carcinogenic risks.
    Albert RE; Train RE; Anderson E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1977 May; 58(5):1537-41. PubMed ID: 853532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.