231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23304974)
1. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various post-stripping polishing methods: an in vitro study.
Gupta P; Gupta N; Patel N; Gupta R; Sandhu GS; Naik C
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 23304974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods.
Arman A; Cehreli SB; Ozel E; Arhun N; Cetinşahin A; Soyman M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):131.e7-14. PubMed ID: 16905055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping.
Piacentini C; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8540483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between different interdental stripping methods and evaluation of abrasive strips: SEM analysis.
Grippaudo C; Cancellieri D; Grecolini ME; Deli R
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 20974449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
Ferraris F; Conti A
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
Türkün LS; Türkün M
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
Attar N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
Jung M; Voit S; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
Ferraris F; Conti A
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: an index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction.
Schmidlin PR; Göhring TN
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 14753337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restitution of enamel after interdental stripping.
Lundgren T; Milleding P; Mohlin B; Nannmark U
Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(6):217-24. PubMed ID: 8134890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
St Germain HA; Meiers JC
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation.
Joseph VP; Rossouw PE; Basson NJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Oct; 102(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 1333728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
