202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23306262)
1. Potential of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis in the removal of phosphorus for aquaculture.
Leo CP; Yahya MZ; Kamal SN; Ahmad AL; Mohammad AW
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):831-7. PubMed ID: 23306262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes.
Leo CP; Chai WK; Mohammad AW; Qi Y; Hoedley AF; Chai SP
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 22053475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) using low pressure reverse osmosis membrane (LPROM).
Razak AR; Ujang Z; Ozaki H
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):161-8. PubMed ID: 17978444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge with a hybrid process of low pressure wet oxidation and nanofiltration.
Blöcher C; Niewersch C; Melin T
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):2009-19. PubMed ID: 22325934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Membrane filtration coupled with chemical precipitation to treat recirculating aquaculture system effluents.
Yang L; Zhou H; Moccia R
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2419-24. PubMed ID: 17071913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wastewater from wood and pulp industry treated by combination of coagulation, adsorption on modified clinoptilolite tuff and membrane processes.
Bennani Y; Kosutić K; Drazević E; Rozeć M
Environ Technol; 2012 Jun; 33(10-12):1159-66. PubMed ID: 22856285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
