These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23306262)

  • 21. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polyamide nanofiltration membranes to remove aniline in aqueous solutions.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Bernal MD; Ortega S
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(9-12):1175-81. PubMed ID: 24701913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dsorption of estrone on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in water and wastewater treatment.
    Nghiem LD; Schäfer AI; Waite TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):265-72. PubMed ID: 12361019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Removal of natural hormone estrone from secondary effluents using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
    Jin X; Hu J; Ong SL
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(2):638-48. PubMed ID: 19879623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimization of phosphorus removal from secondary effluent using simplex method in Tianjin, China.
    Wang Y; Han T; Xu Z; Bao G; Zhu T
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 May; 121(1-3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15885420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advancing post-anoxic denitrification for biological nutrient removal.
    Winkler M; Coats ER; Brinkman CK
    Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6119-30. PubMed ID: 21937071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Arsenate removal using a combination treatment of precipitation and nanofiltration.
    Chang FF; Liu WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 22233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nutrient removal by NF and RO membranes in a decentralized sanitation system.
    van Voorthuizen EM; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3657-67. PubMed ID: 16054670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
    Siegrist H; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acute and chronic responses of activated sludge viability and performance to silica nanoparticles.
    Zheng X; Su Y; Chen Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7182-8. PubMed ID: 22697807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment of fatliquoring effluent from a tannery using membrane separation process: experimental and modeling.
    Prabhavathy C; De S
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Apr; 176(1-3):434-43. PubMed ID: 19962238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Membrane filtration for tertiary treatment of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry.
    Mänttäri M; Nyström M
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(6):99-107. PubMed ID: 17486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment of freshwater fish farm effluent using constructed wetlands: the role of plants and substrate.
    Naylor S; Brlsson J; Labelle MA; Drizo A; Comeau Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(5):215-22. PubMed ID: 14621167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of nanofiltration for the rejection of nickel ions from aqueous solutions and estimation of membrane transport parameters.
    Murthy ZV; Chaudhari LB
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Dec; 160(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 18400379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.