BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23306956)

  • 1. Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers.
    Parameswaran R; Titcomb DR; Blencowe NS; Berrisford RG; Wajed SA; Streets CG; Hollowood AD; Krysztopik R; Barham CP; Blazeby JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1970-7. PubMed ID: 23306956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.
    Ben-David K; Rossidis G; Zlotecki RA; Grobmyer SR; Cendan JC; Sarosi GA; Hochwald SN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3324-9. PubMed ID: 21479689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
    Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term results of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal neoplasm.
    Pennathur A; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ; Ward J; Christie NA; Gibson MK; Schuchert M; Cooper K; Land SR; Belani CP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Jun; 85(6):1930-6; discussion 1936-7. PubMed ID: 18498797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
    Zingg U; McQuinn A; DiValentino D; Esterman AJ; Bessell JR; Thompson SK; Jamieson GG; Watson DI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):911-9. PubMed ID: 19231418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview.
    Smithers BM
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Feb; 4(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 20136592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
    Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
    Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
    Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
    Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health-related quality of life after minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
    Parameswaran R; Blazeby JM; Hughes R; Mitchell K; Berrisford RG; Wajed SA
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 20155792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Warner S; Chang YH; Paripati H; Ross H; Ashman J; Harold K; Day R; Stucky CC; Rule W; Jaroszewski D
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Feb; 97(2):439-45. PubMed ID: 24266955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy in head and neck surgical patients.
    Morris LG; Tran TN; DeLacure MD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec; 137(6):947-9. PubMed ID: 18036426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma.
    Singh RK; Pham TH; Diggs BS; Perkins S; Hunter JG
    Arch Surg; 2011 Jun; 146(6):711-4. PubMed ID: 21690448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.