These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23307970)

  • 1. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.
    Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
    Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
    Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
    Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
    Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?
    Patel KJ; Jain SP; Kapadia PR; Patel NV; Patel S; Patel V
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 64(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 27050348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer performance in a developing world setting: intraocular pressure measurement acquisition and precision.
    Cheng J; Salam T; Russell PJ; Heath DG; Kotecha A
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):736-9. PubMed ID: 23708422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
    Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.