These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23308266)

  • 1. The human brain maintains contradictory and redundant auditory sensory predictions.
    Pieszek M; Widmann A; Gruber T; Schröger E
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53634. PubMed ID: 23308266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal predictive processing depends on context rather than local contingencies.
    Dercksen TT; Stuckenberg MV; Schröger E; Wetzel N; Widmann A
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jun; 58(6):e13811. PubMed ID: 33723870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presentation Probability of Visual-Auditory Pairs Modulates Visually Induced Auditory Predictions.
    Stuckenberg MV; Schröger E; Widmann A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1110-1125. PubMed ID: 30912727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction.
    Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation of early auditory processing by visual information: Prediction or bimodal integration?
    Stuckenberg MV; Schröger E; Widmann A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1538-1551. PubMed ID: 33506354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
    Fitzgerald K; Provost A; Todd J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28972671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sound of silence: Predictive error responses to unexpected sound omission in adults.
    Prete DA; Heikoop D; McGillivray JE; Reilly JP; Trainor LJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 55(8):1972-1985. PubMed ID: 35357048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.
    Mittag M; Takegata R; Winkler I
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(37):9572-9. PubMed ID: 27629709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous storage of two complex temporal sound patterns in auditory sensory memory.
    Brattico E; Winkler I; Näätänen R; Paavilainen P; Tervaniemi M
    Neuroreport; 2002 Oct; 13(14):1747-51. PubMed ID: 12395116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does emotion change auditory prediction and deviance detection?
    Pinheiro AP; Barros C; Dias M; Niznikiewicz M
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():123-133. PubMed ID: 28499839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological evidence of memory-based detection of auditory regularity violations in anesthetized mice.
    Kurkela JLO; Lipponen A; Kyläheiko I; Astikainen P
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):3027. PubMed ID: 29445171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The representation of audiovisual regularities in the human brain.
    Besle J; Hussain Z; Giard MH; Bertrand O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 23190327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system.
    Sussman E; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 11689303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related brain potentials to change in the frequency and temporal structure of sounds in typically developing 5-6-year-old children.
    Ervast L; Hämäläinen JA; Zachau S; Lohvansuu K; Heinänen K; Veijola M; Heikkinen E; Suominen K; Luotonen M; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):413-25. PubMed ID: 26342552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream auditory environments.
    Sussman ES; Bregman AS; Wang WJ; Khan FJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2005 Mar; 5(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 15913011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.
    Sussman ES; Bregman AS; Lee WW
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():218-29. PubMed ID: 25281308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biased relevance filtering in the auditory system: A test of confidence-weighted first-impressions.
    Mullens D; Winkler I; Damaso K; Heathcote A; Whitson L; Provost A; Todd J
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Mar; 115():101-11. PubMed ID: 26844870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study.
    Weise A; Bendixen A; Müller D; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1464():30-42. PubMed ID: 22613810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Encoding of deterministic and stochastic auditory rules in the human brain: The mismatch negativity mechanism does not reflect basic probability.
    Schröger E; Roeber U
    Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 399():107907. PubMed ID: 32143958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.