118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23311840)
1. Prematurely depotentialized? Ethical nonnaturalism and the absurdest-extension objection.
Muders S; Ruether M
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 23311840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Skepticism about the "convertibility" of induced pluripotent stem cells.
Cunningham TV
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 23311843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Twinning, identity, and moral status.
Napier S
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 23311844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does potentiality have a use in bioethics?
Marquis D
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 23311838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The cognitive psychology of the potentiality argument.
Frias L; Struchiner N
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23311841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Potentiality arguments and the definition of "human organism".
Dufner A
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 23311839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When potential does not matter: what developments in cellular biology tell us about the concept of legal personhood.
Will J; Adashi EY; Cohen IG
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 23311842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"?
Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reprogramming potentiality: the co-production of stem cell policy and democracy.
Blasimme A; Schmietow B; Testa G
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 23311837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The embryo potentiality argument revisited: "Once more unto the breach, dear friends".
Hyun I
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 23311836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The moral status of the human embryo according to Peter Singer: individuality, humanity, and personhood.
Howard J
Linacre Q; 2005 Aug; 72(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 16317845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryo loss and double effect.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):537-40. PubMed ID: 23292218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The moral status of the human embryo: the twinning argument.
Brogaard B
Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 16208838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human embryonic stem cell research: what's wrong with it?
Oderberg DS
Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(4):21-33. PubMed ID: 16619431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral uncertainty in bioethical argumentation: a new understanding of the pro-life view on early human embryos.
Żuradzki T
Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 35(6):441-57. PubMed ID: 25230689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-effect reasoning and the conception of human embryos.
Murphy TF
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):529-32. PubMed ID: 22902385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryos, the principle of proportionality, and the shaky ground of moral respect.
Pugh J
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):420-6. PubMed ID: 23445499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jewish and Catholic ethics of reproduction: converging or standing apart?
Zivotofsky AZ; Jotkowitz A
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Nov; 9(11):W1-2. PubMed ID: 19882442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The earliest cells: who are they?
Scarpelli EM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Oct; 12(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 12572589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
