203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23311989)
1. Pharmacoeconomic assessment of therapy for invasive aspergillosis.
Luong ML; Husain S; Rotstein C
Mycoses; 2013 May; 56(3):338-49. PubMed ID: 23311989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of targeted treatments of invasive aspergillosis in adult haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in the Netherlands: a modelling approach.
Ament AJ; Hübben MW; Verweij PE; de Groot R; Warris A; Donnelly JP; van 't Wout J; Severens JL
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Aug; 60(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 17561501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resource use and cost of treatment with voriconazole or conventional amphotericin B for invasive aspergillosis.
Wingard JR; Herbrecht R; Mauskopf J; Schlamm HT; Marciniak A; Roberts CS
Transpl Infect Dis; 2007 Sep; 9(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 17605747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic evaluation of voriconazole versus conventional amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Germany.
Jansen JP; Kern WV; Cornely OA; Karthaus M; Ruhnke M; Ullmann AJ; Resch A
Value Health; 2006; 9(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16441520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative survival and cost of antifungal therapy: posaconazole versus standard antifungals in the treatment of refractory invasive aspergillosis.
Herbrecht R; Rajagopalan S; Danna R; Papadopoulos G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Oct; 26(10):2457-64. PubMed ID: 20822354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic effects of aspergillosis management in high-risk patients.
Leather H
Manag Care Interface; 2005 Apr; 18(4):46-52. PubMed ID: 15889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invasive aspergillosis: is treatment with "inexpensive" amphotericin B cost saving if "expensive" voriconazole is only used on demand?
Garbino J; Schnetzler G; Roberts C
Swiss Med Wkly; 2006 Sep; 136(39-40):624-30. PubMed ID: 17086508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost advantage of voriconazole over amphotericin B deoxycholate for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis.
Lewis JS; Boucher HW; Lubowski TJ; Ambegaonkar AJ; Day DL; Patterson TF
Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Jun; 25(6):839-46. PubMed ID: 15927903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation of voriconazole versus caspofungin for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Belgium.
Selleslag D; Vogelaers D; Marbaix S
Acta Clin Belg; 2009; 64(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 19999386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in the Netherlands.
Jansen JP; Meis JF; Blijlevens NM; van't Wout JW
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1535-46. PubMed ID: 16238893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional experience with voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.
Shehab N; DePestel DD; Mackler ER; Collins CD; Welch K; Erba HP
Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jul; 27(7):970-9. PubMed ID: 17594202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of voriconazole compared with conventional amphotericin B for the primary treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients.
Wenzel R; Del Favero A; Kibbler C; Rogers T; Rotstein C; Mauskopf J; Morris S; Schlamm H; Troke P; Marciniak A
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Mar; 55(3):352-61. PubMed ID: 15728146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in Australia.
Al-Badriyeh D; Liew D; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jan; 63(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 19001450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacoeconomics of voriconazole in the management of invasive fungal infections.
Al-Badriyeh D; Heng SC; Neoh CF; Slavin M; Stewart K; Kong DC
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Dec; 10(6):623-36. PubMed ID: 21155694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of voriconazole vs. liposomal amphotericin B in empiric treatment of invasive fungal infections in Turkey.
Turner SJ; Senol E; Kara A; Al-Badriyeh D; Dinleyici EC; Kong DC
BMC Infect Dis; 2013 Nov; 13():560. PubMed ID: 24279677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strategy of following voriconazole versus amphotericin B therapy with other licensed antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis: impact of other therapies on outcome.
Patterson TF; Boucher HW; Herbrecht R; Denning DW; Lortholary O; Ribaud P; Rubin RH; Wingard JR; DePauw B; Schlamm HT; Troke P; Bennett JE; ;
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Nov; 41(10):1448-52. PubMed ID: 16231256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of the empirical antifungal strategy in oncohaematological patients].
Romá-Sánchez E; Poveda-Andrés JL; García-Pellicer J; Salavert-Lletí M; Jarque-Ramos I
Farm Hosp; 2008; 32(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 18426697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of voriconazole versus posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukaemia.
Al-Badriyeh D; Slavin M; Liew D; Thursky K; Downey M; Grigg A; Bajel A; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 May; 65(5):1052-61. PubMed ID: 20237074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus voriconazole for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia.
Collins CD; Stuntebeck ER; DePestel DD; Stevenson JG
Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 17358095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic evaluation of voriconazole versus caspofungin for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Spain.
Domínguez-Gil A; Martín I; García Vargas M; Del Castillo A; Díaz S; Sánchez C
Clin Drug Investig; 2007; 27(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 17305414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]