109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23312244)
1. Clinical relevance of conversion rate and its evaluation in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 23312244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Keurentjes JHM; Briët JM; de Bock GH; Mourits MJE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1021-1026. PubMed ID: 28842767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Siedhoff MT; Carey ET; Findley AD; Riggins LE; Garrett JM; Steege JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Twijnstra AR; Blikkendaal MD; van Zwet EW; van Kesteren PJ; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 22395145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body surface area: a new predictor factor for conversion and prolonged operative time in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Vaccaro CA; Vaccarezza H; Rossi GL; Mentz R; Im VM; Quintana GO; Peralta N; Soriano ER
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Nov; 55(11):1153-9. PubMed ID: 23044676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing ≥1 kilogram: a series of 71 cases and review of the literature.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Serati M; Casarin J; Sturla D; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 24012921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What determines the need to morcellate the uterus during total laparoscopic hysterectomy?
Condous G; Bignardi T; Alhamdan D; Van Calster B; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D; Lam A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 18996059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: factors associated with the rate of conversion to open surgery.
Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Rumolo V; Rosati A; Rossitto C; Cosentino F; Turco LC; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Ciccarone F; Scambia G; Uccella S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 39(6):805-810. PubMed ID: 31001998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: eliciting preference of performers and colleagues via conjoint analysis.
Twijnstra AR; Stiggelbout AM; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 21803663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy.
Leonard F; Chopin N; Borghese B; Fotso A; Foulot H; Coste J; Mignon A; Chapron C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 16036189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals.
Kolfschoten NE; van Leersum NJ; Gooiker GA; Marang van de Mheen PJ; Eddes EH; Kievit J; Brand R; Tanis PJ; Bemelman WA; Tollenaar RA; Meijerink J; Wouters MW
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):916-21. PubMed ID: 22735713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Conversion to Laparotomy of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecology.
Lim CS; Mowers EL; Mahnert N; Skinner BD; Kamdar N; Morgan DM; As-Sanie S
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 27824755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Body mass and risk of complications after hysterectomy on benign indications.
Osler M; Daugbjerg S; Frederiksen BL; Ottesen B
Hum Reprod; 2011 Jun; 26(6):1512-8. PubMed ID: 21467207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.
Lezoche E; Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; D'Ambrosio G
Minerva Chir; 2003 Aug; 58(4):491-502, 502-7. PubMed ID: 14603161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the presence of previous caesarean section: a review of one hundred forty-one cases in the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit.
Wang L; Merkur H; Hardas G; Soo S; Lujic S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 20226406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
