These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2331246)

  • 1. [The use of a test model in a stepped form (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in X-ray diagnosis. 2. The use of test steps for testing the POLAROID-TPX immediate X-ray picture system].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Apr; 103(4):118-20. PubMed ID: 2331246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The use of a test phantom in step-shaped forms (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in x-ray diagnosis. 1. The use of test steps for the estimation of image quality after modified darkroom technics].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 103(3):92-4. PubMed ID: 2317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Dosimetry during use of dental teleradiography with positive Polaroid TPX radiographic film. (Comparison with a traditional negative radiographic film)].
    Pellerin Y; Le Denmat D
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 3866281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Labeling of HD x-ray pictures].
    Meisen N; Flückiger M
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 1993; 135(5):172. PubMed ID: 8316819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A simple test phantom in the form of a staircase for running control of the image in veterinary roentgenology].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1989 Apr; 102(4):117-23. PubMed ID: 2719634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry].
    Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA
    Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of a standard x-ray film with a high-latitude film in thoracic diagnosis].
    Oestmann JW; Hendrickx PH; Rieder P; Geerlings H
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Jan; 39(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3952431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New X-ray film/screen system promises higher resolution.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Dec; 21(49):4. PubMed ID: 10115021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative Polaroid roentgenograms.
    Smith MJ
    Urology; 1987 Nov; 30(5):509-12. PubMed ID: 3672692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiologic exchange. Patient dose can be reduced by using 105 mm photofluoro spot films instead of the screen-film cassette spot radiographs.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 60(6):515-6. PubMed ID: 2762541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Light fog: picture of a problem.
    Malott JC; Fodor J
    Radiol Technol; 1984; 55(4):105-6. PubMed ID: 6718706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Practical quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Stender HS
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Dec; 33(12):618-25. PubMed ID: 7455537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficiency of the Thai processing solution in clinical practice].
    Chongruk C
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1989; 39(6):219-25. PubMed ID: 2640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinically acceptable tolerance of roentgen generator exposure parameters.
    Forsberg H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 2952133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.