These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2331247)

  • 21. Comparison of a monoclonal antibody-based capture/enrichment sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay with immunomagnetic bead separation for the detection of attachment effacement Escherichia coli O26 strains from cattle faeces.
    Finlay D; Bell C; Ball HJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 May; 100(5):1141-6. PubMed ID: 16630015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid combined assay for Salmonella detection in food samples.
    Gadó I; Major P; Király M; Pláveczky MG
    Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 2000; 47(4):445-56. PubMed ID: 11056764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of sample storage and delayed secondary enrichment on detection of Salmonella spp in swine feces.
    O'Carroll JM; Davies PR; Correa MT; Slenning BD
    Am J Vet Res; 1999 Mar; 60(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 10188820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serologic detection of Salmonella dublin carriers on a large dairy.
    House JK; Smith BP; Dilling GW; Roden LD
    Am J Vet Res; 1993 Sep; 54(9):1391-9. PubMed ID: 8239123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
    Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of pooled and individual bird sampling for detection of Salmonella in commercial egg laying flocks.
    Arnold ME; Carrique-Mas JJ; McLaren I; Davies RH
    Prev Vet Med; 2011 May; 99(2-4):176-84. PubMed ID: 21288584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genus-specific detection of salmonellae in equine feces by use of the polymerase chain reaction.
    Cohen ND; Neibergs HL; Wallis DE; Simpson RB; McGruder ED; Hargis BM
    Am J Vet Res; 1994 Aug; 55(8):1049-54. PubMed ID: 7978642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification and prevalence of Salmonella in beef cattle presenting at slaughter.
    Fegan N; Vanderlinde P; Higgs G; Desmarchelier P
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(5):892-8. PubMed ID: 15479403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and microbiological culture for detection of salmonellae in equine feces and environmental samples.
    Cohen ND; Martin LJ; Simpson RB; Wallis DE; Neibergs HL
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):780-6. PubMed ID: 8725799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of Salmonella dublin mammary gland infection in carrier cows, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody in milk or serum.
    Smith BP; Oliver DG; Singh P; Dilling G; Martin PA; Ram BP; Jang LS; Sharkov N; Orsborn JS
    Am J Vet Res; 1989 Aug; 50(8):1352-60. PubMed ID: 2675696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs.
    Davies PR; Turkson PK; Funk JA; Nichols MA; Ladely SR; Fedorka-Cray PJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 89(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 10945794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers.
    Braun C; Kostka V; Balks E; Redmann T; Helmuth R
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1998 May; 45(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparative studies with Bierbrauer's tetrathionate broth and selenite broth in the demonstration of salmonella in fecal samples of cattle and in bacteriologic meat control].
    Heidrich D
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr (1946); 1963 Nov; 70(21):595-601. PubMed ID: 5896696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Salmonella Give infection in 2 dairy herds.
    Roy R; Higgins R; Fortin M; Tardif S
    Can Vet J; 2001 Jun; 42(6):468-70. PubMed ID: 11424580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing of bulk tank milk for Salmonella Dublin infection in Danish dairy herds.
    Wedderkopp A; Strøger U; Bitsch V; Lind P
    Can J Vet Res; 2001 Jan; 65(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11227189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Detection of Salmonella in faecal, tissue, and feed samples by conventional culture methods and VIDAS Salmonella Test].
    Sommerhäuser J; Failing K
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(1-2):22-7. PubMed ID: 16450704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The detection of salmonellas using Rambach agar].
    Weber A; Wachowitz R
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1994 Feb; 107(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 7993335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of exposure, storage times, and types of holding media on the drag-swab monitoring technique for Salmonella.
    Opara OO; Mallinson ET; Tate CR; Carr LE; Miller RG; Stewart L; Kelleher C; Johnston RW; Joseph SW
    Avian Dis; 1992; 36(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 1567312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New method of serological testing for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) by flow cytometry.
    Eda S; Elliott B; Scott MC; Waters WR; Bannantine JP; Whitlock RH; Speer CA
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2005; 2(3):250-62. PubMed ID: 16156706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative studies on enrichment and selective media for isolation of Salmonellae from faecal specimens.
    Robertsson JA; Söderlind O
    Acta Vet Scand; 1977; 18(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 333883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.